I am beginning to suspect a problem with wine_server_call. I am confused
because I would have thought this was something that is pretty solid.
In HOOK_CallHooks we call SERVER_START_REQ( start_hook_chain ). When I put
debugging in the server I see that reply->active_hooks is getting properly
set
Alexandre,
> The idea is that active_hooks is a shortcut to avoid calling the
> server if we know that a hook is not set. If we don't have a valid
> active_hooks then we need to call the server, which will then tell us
> whether or not we really have a hook to call.
I don't know if this matters,
"Phil Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Active_hooks is pretty much set by the server. Bit 0x8000 is set to
> indicate that the bitmask is valid. One of my suspicions that I hope to
> confirm with debug is that in my case of failure active_hooks is 0.
>
> Would it not make more sense to
Unfortunately this problem I am seeing is very hard to reproduce. I have
added some more debug in case it happens again. However, looking at code,
the HOOK_IsHooked function seems strange:
BOOL HOOK_IsHooked( INT id )
{
struct user_thread_info *thread_info = get_user_thread_info();
if (
