RE: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-17 Thread Greg Geldorp
> From: Juan Lang > Ha, right you are. Hm. Well, a wireshark capture of the connection > might help, to verify that the web server is in fact attaching the > correct certificate to the connection in the IPv6 case. The URL in question is actually https://testbot.winehq.org/. Browsing there using

Re: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-16 Thread Juan Lang
> That's going to be a bit of a problem. The tests fail on Windows, haven't > found a way yet to convince the Windows DLLs to produce trace logs... Ha, right you are. Hm. Well, a wireshark capture of the connection might help, to verify that the web server is in fact attaching the correct certif

RE: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-16 Thread Greg Geldorp
> From: Juan Lang [mailto:juan.l...@gmail.com] > > Sorry, haven't had the time to investigate yet (only looked up the > > error code which is ERROR_INTERNET_SEC_CERT_CN_INVALID). > > That would imply that the certificate checking is failing. Please get > a +crypt,+chain log of the failing tests an

Re: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-16 Thread Juan Lang
> Sorry, haven't had the time to investigate yet (only looked up the error code > which is > ERROR_INTERNET_SEC_CERT_CN_INVALID). That would imply that the certificate checking is failing. Please get a +crypt,+chain log of the failing tests and attach to a bug for me to have a look. --Juan

RE: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-16 Thread Greg Geldorp
> From: Austin Lund > On 14 November 2010 07:40, Greg Geldorp wrote: > > Hi, > > > > All TestBot VMs (with the exception of the Win9x ones) now have IPv6 > > connectivity. I was surprised that there was even a IPv6 stack available > > for NT4, it was produced by Microsoft Research. > > The VMs are

Re: TestBot IPv6 enabled

2010-11-16 Thread Austin Lund
On 14 November 2010 07:40, Greg Geldorp wrote: > Hi, > > All TestBot VMs (with the exception of the Win9x ones) now have IPv6 > connectivity. I was surprised that there was even a IPv6 stack available for > NT4, it was produced by Microsoft Research. > The VMs are (and always have been) behind a