RE: Test timeouts

2011-01-06 Thread Greg Geldorp
From: Alexandre Julliard > of course the testbot having a 5 minutes timeout makes this worse Yeah, I don't remember the reasoning behind that choice. It probably makes more sense to use the same timeout as winetest. Thanks for making your position clear before I spent time on implementing stuff,

Re: Test timeouts

2011-01-06 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Greg Geldorp writes: >> From: Alexandre Julliard >> >> I think it would be better to make the test detect such an environment >> and have it skip some things if it finds that it's taking too long. > > I guess that's what we currently have... In effect, if it takes too long, > the final tests are

RE: Test timeouts

2011-01-06 Thread Greg Geldorp
> From: Alexandre Julliard > > I think it would be better to make the test detect such an environment > and have it skip some things if it finds that it's taking too long. I guess that's what we currently have... In effect, if it takes too long, the final tests are skipped. I was hoping we could d

Re: Test timeouts

2011-01-06 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Greg Geldorp writes: > Although the number of timeouts in msi tests has dropped considerably after > Hans decided to do something about them, they're unfortunately not > completely gone. It seems that the remaining timeouts have a strong > dependency on the environment. It's possible to tweak the

Re: Test timeouts

2011-01-05 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:01 +0100, wy...@volny.cz wrote: > s there is an activity to make (not only) WylBOT green and happy > ;c) i can add more info, based on WyldBOT's install documentation i > looked right now and found there: > > * Turn off system restore > > So longer time out may not help