Re: Question on Conformance Test

2011-04-27 Thread Stefan Dösinger
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 18:05:59 Austin English wrote: > Normal practice is to try to match the XP+ behavior, and mark NT as > broken if it differs. In d3d we prefer results that some applications depend on. E.g. Windows XP has pretty relaxed or no error checking on IDirect3DVertexBuffer9::Lock

Re: Question on Conformance Test

2011-04-27 Thread Austin English
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 22:50, James McKenzie wrote: > All: > > I am writing a conformance test for the richedit function EM_FINDWORDBREAK. >  I realize that WindowsNT 4.0 is our base configuration and most of the > values process the same.  However, a couple of values process differently > for Wi

Question on Conformance Test

2011-04-27 Thread Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle
Hi, James McKenzie wrote: >I realize that WindowsNT 4.0 is our base configuration IMHO that doesn't matter. Winecfg's default changed from w95 to w2k to xp while I was looking. >What would be the BEST method of annotating this: >ok ( GetLastError() == WINXP_ERROR || GetLastError() == WINNT40_ER

Question on Conformance Test

2011-04-26 Thread James McKenzie
All: I am writing a conformance test for the richedit function EM_FINDWORDBREAK. I realize that WindowsNT 4.0 is our base configuration and most of the values process the same. However, a couple of values process differently for Windows NT 4.0/Windows2000, WindowsXP/Windows2003 and Windows