Re: Question about replacing a stub...

2003-12-28 Thread Joshua Walker
Thanks for the reply... --- "Gregory M. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [A Bunch of really insightful stuff] Implementing should best be left to the implemnters. ^_^ I'll leave the stub in the .spec file, leaving the unimplemnted functions undocumented. This has some advantages. First c2man,

Re: Question about replacing a stub...

2003-12-28 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On Sunday 28 December 2003 10:16 pm, Joshua Walker wrote: > Hi all. > On my ever winding quest to fill in the win32 API > documentation, I have found, I think, an intresting > issue. > When the documentation is generated with > c2man.pl, it checks the .spec file to see if the > function i

Question about replacing a stub...

2003-12-28 Thread Joshua Walker
Hi all. On my ever winding quest to fill in the win32 API documentation, I have found, I think, an intresting issue. When the documentation is generated with c2man.pl, it checks the .spec file to see if the function is a stub or not. The problem is that if it is a stub, no documentation w