On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:39:34PM +0100, Michael Jung wrote:
> I would like to use source code from LibTomCrypt (...). LibTomCrypt
> is in the public domain.
> 1. What is the legaly correct way to do this? As I understand it,
> public domain source can simply be taken as is and re-licensed under
Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2. A more technical question: LibTomCrypt's original sources are highly
> customizable (A lot of conditional compilation and hook-functions). Since we
> have fairly special requirements for rsaenh, I could cut down the source code
> a lot. However, thi
>1. What is the legaly correct way to do this? As I understand it,
>public domain source can simply be taken as is and re-licensed under
>the LGPL. Is this correct? Am I allowed to remove the headers in the
>original file, which state that the code is public domain? How do you
>generally acknowledg
Michael Jung wrote:
I would like to use source code from LibTomCrypt (http://libtomcrypt.org) in
my implementation of rsaenh.dll (which I still hope has a remote chance of
being accepted into wine ;-), in order to get rid of the OpenSSL
dependencies.
Sounds good. I wonder if you can then build
Hello,
I would like to use source code from LibTomCrypt (http://libtomcrypt.org) in
my implementation of rsaenh.dll (which I still hope has a remote chance of
being accepted into wine ;-), in order to get rid of the OpenSSL
dependencies. LibTomCrypt is in the public domain. I have two questions
