On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:40 PM, TheBlunderbuss
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like it, since I already do something like this!
> > How about a more surreptitious way of marking versions? Maybe a reg key
> > or other file.
> > This way, users mi
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 20:46:08 schrieb Austin English:
> > My comment from the bug:
> > "How about a little file in .wine or a registry key that is read upon
> > running wine, and should match the current wine version. If it doesn't,
> > call wine
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:40 PM, TheBlunderbuss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it, since I already do something like this!
> How about a more surreptitious way of marking versions? Maybe a reg key
> or other file.
> This way, users might not be tempted to rename their ~/.wine and also
>
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On the wine-users list, we're getting a lot of users who
> have old or even ancient .wine directories, and
> whose problems go away with a fresh .wine directory
>
> Perhaps we should have wineprefixcreate stamp the version
> of wine the .wine directory was created with,
> make wi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should
> stop telling people to blow away their .wine, and have them run
> wineprefixcreate instead. Then if wineprefixcreate doesn't do the
> update correctly we need to figure out why and fix it. Onc
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we have a stable wine prefix in 1.0, I don't see what could
> possibly be added in 1.2 that would break that. The idea is that,
> even if you add a new dll that needs to be registered in, say, 1.0.5,
> you still don't need to remove your wine prefi
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can I bring the discussion back to my proposal,
> > which was to have wine-1.0 notice old, unsupported .wine
> > directories, and do something sensible?
>
> If we're going to force users to remake ~/.wine, it would be
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If we have a stable wine prefix in 1.0, I don't see what could
>> possibly be added in 1.2 that would break that. The idea is that,
>> even if you add a new dll that needs to be registered in, say, 1
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we have a stable wine prefix in 1.0, I don't see what could
> possibly be added in 1.2 that would break that. The idea is that,
> even if you add a new dll that needs to be registered in, say, 1.0.5,
> you still don
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:11 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Stefan Dösin
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:11 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 20:46:08 schrieb Austin En
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 20:46:08 schrieb Austin English:
> >
> > > My comment from the bug:
> > > "How about a little file in .wine
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 20:46:08 schrieb Austin English:
>
> > My comment from the bug:
> > "How about a little file in .wine or a registry key that is read upon
> > running wine, and should match the current wine ve
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 20:46:08 schrieb Austin English:
> My comment from the bug:
> "How about a little file in .wine or a registry key that is read upon
> running wine, and should match the current wine version. If it doesn't,
> call wineprefixcreate (or pop up an error saying that the regist
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:35 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the wine-users list, we're getting a lot of users who
> > have old or even ancient .wine directories, and
> > whose problems go away with
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the wine-users list, we're getting a lot of users who
> have old or even ancient .wine directories, and
> whose problems go away with a fresh .wine directory
>
> Perhaps we should have wineprefixcreate stamp the version
On the wine-users list, we're getting a lot of users who
have old or even ancient .wine directories, and
whose problems go away with a fresh .wine directory
Perhaps we should have wineprefixcreate stamp the version
of wine the .wine directory was created with,
make wine-1.0 refuse to run with pre-
17 matches
Mail list logo
