On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
>
> > On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a
> >> Unicode variant.
> >
> > Does it matter that native advp
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a
Unicode variant.
Does it matter that native advpack only has Ansi functions?
That's changing in the latest Windows PSDK. Henc
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a
> Unicode variant.
Does it matter that native advpack only has Ansi functions? I think
we should leave it the way it is, because any application that uses
advpack will on
