Hi Paul,
On 2/25/10 11:43 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
On 02/24/2010 09:30 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 2/24/10 8:59 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
informatio
Hi Jacek,
On 02/24/2010 09:30 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 2/24/10 8:59 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
information.
2) an inf file and some code to register/unregis
Jacek Caban writes:
> I think both 2) and 3) are way better than regsvr.c. It avoids code
> duplication and you can add much more custom registries without a
> single line of C (I'd call it more flexible, but it's more a better
> flexibility/efforts factor). IRegistrar is much simplier than .inf
Hi Paul,
On 2/24/10 8:59 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
information.
2) an inf file and some code to register/unregister the dll.
3) IRegistrar from atl.dll
The first
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
information.
2) an inf file and some code to register/unregister the dll.
The first one is the most common in our source but I can remember a
comment from AJ abou
