On 01/30/2011 07:27 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think Dan Kegel does not want them in the Winetest list. I'll defer
to AJ as to what HE wants.
Sure ! The boss's always right.
And it should be great to find a way to identify these "fake" windows.
On 01/30/2011 07:29 PM, F Capela wrote:
Couple
> From: GOUJON Alexandre
>
> On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>> On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
>>> winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
>>> e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053
On 1/30/11 9:02 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/42540
> I mean, yeah it's not legal, it's bad and what you want but what about if
> they provide results that differ from the daily bot results ?
So what? You know that the Windows software may have changed, and you
can't replicate the results yourself (unless you also feel like
breaking the law).
> D
On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053/MicroXP_v0.82_-_eXPerience
Agreed?
+1.
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053/MicroXP_v0.82_-_eXPerience
Agreed?
+1. And that is a pirate version of Windows anyway.
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053/MicroXP_v0.82_-_eXPerience
Agreed?
