On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> A user (Qian Hong) mentioned that a post to wine-devel
> didn't show up in several hours, so this is a ping to see
> what the latency is.
His message shows up in the marc archive,
http://marc.info/?l=wine-devel
but the winehq ar
2011/1/27 André Hentschel :
> Am 26.01.2011 15:52, schrieb Dan Kegel:
>> A user (Qian Hong) mentioned that a post to wine-devel
>> didn't show up in several hours, so this is a ping to see
>> what the latency is.
>>
>>
> I noticed a strange flooding at the
Am 26.01.2011 15:52, schrieb Dan Kegel:
> A user (Qian Hong) mentioned that a post to wine-devel
> didn't show up in several hours, so this is a ping to see
> what the latency is.
>
>
I noticed a strange flooding at the end of
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/20
A user (Qian Hong) mentioned that a post to wine-devel
didn't show up in several hours, so this is a ping to see
what the latency is.
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:09:39 +0300, Devaev Maxim
wrote:
The implementation uses a library icmp.dll. Non-root user in Linux
can not work with icmp, special permission is required capabilities.
I
made it so that in case of error simulates the ping delay.
Why this patch is not accepted in
Trey Hunner writes:
> +int main(int argc, char** argv)
> +{
> +int n = 0;
> +int optc;
> +
> +while ((optc = getopt( argc, argv, "n:w:" )) != -1)
> +{
> +switch(optc)
> +{
> +case 'n':
> +n = atoi( optarg );
> +break;
Has there been any discussion or progress on how to fix bug #1598 about
Delphi/VisualBasic applications not having minimize/maximize decorations
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598)? According to one of the
comments, the window management code would not be touched before 0.9 .
However
These could get in unchanged, perhaps?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-June/028096.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-June/027940.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-June/027978.html
This is the one I want comments for before I split it int
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:54:32PM +0100, Oliver Stieber wrote:
>
> --- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
> >
>
> Which emails, the last two emails I recieved from you were:
> Debian packages and [daniel: OpenGL bug in 20050930]
Yeah, that
--- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
>
Which emails, the last two emails I recieved from you were:
Debian packages and [daniel: OpenGL bug in 20050930]
Oliver.
> confused,
> Daniel
>
>
>
___
I just got it too.
Hiji
--- Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 October 2005 14:29, Daniel wrote:
> > Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
>
> I do :)
>
> Kuba
>
>
>
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Edi
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 20:29 schrieb Daniel:
> Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
I receive them
Stefan
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 14:29, Daniel wrote:
> Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
I do :)
Kuba
Is there anyone that actually receives my mails?
confused,
Daniel
Hi Gerald,
It seems nobody can send you email because:
Recipient: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reason:Service unavailable; Client host
[fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com]
blocked using abuse.rfc-ignorant.org; Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]; See
http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/block.html
15 matches
Mail list logo
