On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> On 18/08/13 17:35, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> We have some instructions on Bugzilla's bug submission page (currently
'Please do not PASTE logs and back traces'). It may make sense t
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
[...]
> So who is to blame? Is it your fault? It's not mine.
No, it is not yours. It cannot possibly be yours.
> Perhaps you are blaming Codeweavers?
Uh? How did they get brought into this.
Just stop trolling already!
--
Francois Gouget htt
On 18/08/13 17:35, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
[...]
We have some instructions on Bugzilla's bug submission page (currently
'Please do not PASTE logs and back traces'). It may make sense to add
something for the bug links either there or on the page confirming
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
[...]
> > We have some instructions on Bugzilla's bug submission page (currently
> > 'Please do not PASTE logs and back traces'). It may make sense to add
> > something for the bug links either there or on the page confirming the
> > bug was enered. It would ha
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:16:27 +0200 (CEST)
Francois Gouget wrote:
> We have some instructions on Bugzilla's bug submission page (currently
> 'Please do not PASTE logs and back traces'). It may make sense to add
> something for the bug links either there or on the page confirming the
> bug was
On 18/08/13 10:16, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
[...]
It takes longer to create a bug report than it does to link it to the
database. It really isn't that hard.
But adding a link requires going and logging into a separate web site.
That's really not the part o
On 18/08/13 09:56, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:51:19 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
I believe someone managed to run a script to find the unlinked bugs. I
can't remember who it was now, sadly, and I don't know if it was
server-side, whi
On 18 August 2013 11:16, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
> [...]
>> It takes longer to create a bug report than it does to link it to the
>> database. It really isn't that hard.
>
> But adding a link requires going and logging into a separate web site.
> That's reall
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Ken Sharp wrote:
[...]
> It takes longer to create a bug report than it does to link it to the
> database. It really isn't that hard.
But adding a link requires going and logging into a separate web site.
That's really not the part of the normal flow of entering a bug.
> The
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:51:19 +0100
> Ken Sharp wrote:
>
> > I believe someone managed to run a script to find the unlinked bugs. I
> > can't remember who it was now, sadly, and I don't know if it was
> > server-side, which would obviously be quicke
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:37:33 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
> I can, and do, search Bugzilla for that. It is a massive PITA having to
> do it but a script would make it easier, however...
>
>
Users can add bug links, so if someone would run an updated script and post the
results we could post it on
On 17/08/13 13:36, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:07:32 +0200
André Hentschel wrote:
So this is just with no link in "Show Apps affected by this bug"?
Beside it being outdated i think it's not exactly what Ken wants,
I can, and do, search Bugzilla for that. It is a massive
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:07:32 +0200
André Hentschel wrote:
>
> So this is just with no link in "Show Apps affected by this bug"?
> Beside it being outdated i think it's not exactly what Ken wants,
>
I think what Ken wants is for people to add the bug links when they create the
bug so we don't
Am 16.08.2013 23:02, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:51:19 +0100
> Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>>
>> I believe someone managed to run a script to find the unlinked bugs. I
>> can't remember who it was now, sadly, and I don't know if it was
>> server-side, which would obviously be quick
On 16/08/13 22:02, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
Dan Kegel. http://kegel.com/wine/unlinked.html
Good find! :-)
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:51:19 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
>
> I believe someone managed to run a script to find the unlinked bugs. I
> can't remember who it was now, sadly, and I don't know if it was
> server-side, which would obviously be quicker.
>
>
Dan Kegel. http://kegel.com/wine/unlinked.htm
On 16/08/13 19:15, Vincent Povirk wrote:
If we really want the links to be up to date, we should figure out a
way to make them show up on bugzilla, without clicking through to a
search. Otherwise, the only time someone is likely to notice a bug
that hasn't been linked is if they're looking for it
If we really want the links to be up to date, we should figure out a
way to make them show up on bugzilla, without clicking through to a
search. Otherwise, the only time someone is likely to notice a bug
that hasn't been linked is if they're looking for it specifically and
happened to start their s
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
> There's little point in my continually asking users to add bug links to the
> AppDB if maintainers and/or administrators don't bother themselves.
>
> It takes longer to create a bug report than it does to link it to the
> database. It really isn'
There's little point in my continually asking users to add bug links to
the AppDB if maintainers and/or administrators don't bother themselves.
It takes longer to create a bug report than it does to link it to the
database. It really isn't that hard.
I've added hundreds over the past few week
20 matches
Mail list logo
