On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:38:34PM -0800, WINE wrote:
> Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So ld.so really wants to get 20xMB memory but fails.
> >
> > -> Not good on low memory machines.
>
> Hmmm I would have expected it to overcommit that memory. Do you have
> memory limits set?
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:38, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Btw, why don't we use -Wa,--noexecstack ?
>
> It doesn't help with prelink AFAICT.
Is it really too late to get some kind of hook into prelink to stop it
interfering with Wine? It seems daft that we need such a big hack when
surely a flag
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So ld.so really wants to get 20xMB memory but fails.
>
> -> Not good on low memory machines.
Hmmm I would have expected it to overcommit that memory. Do you have
memory limits set?
> Btw, why don't we use -Wa,--noexecstack ?
It doesn't help with pre
Hi,
On SuSE 8.2, i586 glibc, loader/wine-* crash due to the 256 MB static array
in main().
The test machine has just 64MB RAM and 200MB swap.
If I start decreasing the array it works, up to 201MB.
$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ./wine-kthread
./wine-kthread: error while loading shared libraries: ./wine-k
