Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-11-03 Thread Eric Pouech
Mike Hearn wrote: On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:07:56 +0200, Sir Marcus Meissner scribed thus: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is accessing offsets 0x15, 0x16, 0x17, 0x18. (base memory size and extended memory size?) Do we have any tools that can demangle MSVC++ symbol name

Re: Fw: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 12:34:13AM +0100, Martin Fuchs wrote: > On 25.10.2003 22:52:30 Mike Hearn wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:07:56 +0200, Sir Marcus Meissner scribed thus: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > It is accessing offsets 0x15, 0x16, 0x17

Fw: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Martin Fuchs
On 25.10.2003 22:52:30 Mike Hearn wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:07:56 +0200, Sir Marcus Meissner scribed thus: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > It is accessing offsets 0x15, 0x16, 0x17, 0x18. > > > > (base memory size and extended memory size?) > > Do we h

Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:07:56 +0200, Sir Marcus Meissner scribed thus: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It is accessing offsets 0x15, 0x16, 0x17, 0x18. > > (base memory size and extended memory size?) Do we have any tools that can demangle MSVC++ symbol names? c++filt

Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 09:24:19AM -0500, David D. Hagood wrote: > Andreas Mohr wrote: > >>>I do not know, why it does outb $al,0x70, inb 0x71, $al ... > > That looks like a "read realtime clock/CMOS" function. Now WHY an > application would be directly reading the RTC Its office suckage. T

Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Tom
David D Hagood wrote: Andreas Mohr wrote: I do not know, why it does outb $al,0x70, inb 0x71, $al ... That looks like a "read realtime clock/CMOS" function. Now WHY an application would be directly reading the RTC Incase your faking the system clock ? Tom

Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread David D. Hagood
Andreas Mohr wrote: I do not know, why it does outb $al,0x70, inb 0x71, $al ... That looks like a "read realtime clock/CMOS" function. Now WHY an application would be directly reading the RTC

Re: PATCH: uncripple winword 2000

2003-10-25 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 02:23:17PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Hi, > > Make Winword 2000 work again. > > I do not know, why it does outb $al,0x70, inb 0x71, $al ... > > And I am _afraid_ to ask. Why, that's perfectly ok... Just imagine your feeling if it also did: outb $al,0x70, outb al