Re: PATCH: handle non aligned mmaps of sections

2003-11-12 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:38:03AM -0800, Steven Edwards wrote: > --- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think it makes sense to use the normal mapping code for such > > files, we should really have a separate loader for the NT kernel > > stuff > > (which can of course re-use

Re: PATCH: handle non aligned mmaps of sections

2003-11-12 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:59:31PM +0100, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > > "Steven" == Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Steven> --- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't think it makes sense to use the normal mapping code for such > >> files, we should reall

Re: PATCH: handle non aligned mmaps of sections

2003-11-12 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Steven" == Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steven> --- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think it makes sense to use the normal mapping code for such >> files, we should really have a separate loader for the NT kernel >> stuff (which can of

Re: PATCH: handle non aligned mmaps of sections

2003-11-12 Thread Steven Edwards
--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it makes sense to use the normal mapping code for such > files, we should really have a separate loader for the NT kernel > stuff > (which can of course re-use some lower level functions of the current > loader). Do we also create a

Re: PATCH: handle non aligned mmaps of sections

2003-11-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The file itself is page aligned in these cases, so don't get bad > overlaps. > > This is in a codepath which did not trigger before, this is just new > with WDM handling. I don't think it makes sense to use the normal mapping code for such files, we s