On January 11, 2005 08:02 am, Bill Medland wrote:
> Any idea what is going wrong in the OXID handling here?
See below for theory
>
> Is "a" the first thread of the new process? Is the problem that it should
> be "b"?
>
> (I've removed a few extraneous traces)
> (This is after the COM_CreateApart
Bill Medland wrote:
Any idea what is going wrong in the OXID handling here?
...
000b:warn:ole:register_ifstub Could not map OXID a to apartment object
I think I know what the problem is. The MTA isn't added to the
apartments list, so when we search for the OXID of the MTA, we don't
Any idea what is going wrong in the OXID handling here?
Is "a" the first thread of the new process? Is the problem that it should be
"b"?
(I've removed a few extraneous traces)
(This is after the COM_CreateApartment fixes patch)
0009:trace:ole:create_marshalled_proxy
rclsid={4dfceca2-156a-4e0
