Scott wrote:
> So it turns out it's not a kernel config issue per se:
>
>On 03/25/2011 06:05 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> The initial hard limit value is not a CONFIG option...
>> What is the issue with having upstart set this limit early in the boot
>> cycle? Won't all new processes inherit the modif
On 03/25/2011 06:26 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Scott, correct me if I'm wrong, but does Natty still have the
> hard limit of 1024 files open per process?
> If so, should be ask people to go vote for
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663090
> ?
>
> Getting that limit raised might a
Nope, this isn't about the select() limit.
The soft limit on file handles should stay at 1024 so apps that use select()
don't break.
Apps like wine that have already switched away from select should be able to
raise their soft limit if they want more file desciptors. Wine already does
this.
But ub
On Friday 25 March 2011 03:26:25 pm Dan Kegel wrote:
> Scott, correct me if I'm wrong, but does Natty still have the
> hard limit of 1024 files open per process?
> If so, should be ask people to go vote for
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663090
> ?
>
> Getting that limit rai
Scott, correct me if I'm wrong, but does Natty still have the
hard limit of 1024 files open per process?
If so, should be ask people to go vote for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663090
?
Getting that limit raised might avoid increasing numbers of
support requests from users
Folks,
I'll be out for the rest of the week, so there won't be a release this
Friday. 1.1.34 will be released on December 4. And with the new patch
tracker you can watch the patches pile up while I'm away ;-)
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
