Hi,
Just wanted to mention that there is a new Coverity run. There were some issues
the last weeks that made sure the source wasn't updated (most likely started
with the disk issue on winehq.org early February).
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Is it a bug? I don't know those flags well enough.
It's not a bug, a constant 0 value is passed as flags to
set_nsstyle_attr. I've marked it as FALSE in coverity.
Jacek
Alistair wrote:
>> 873 FORWARD_NULLHTMLStyle_put_fontWeight dlls/mshtml/htmlstyle.c
>
> NULL is a valid value to be passed though to gecko.
Here's more of the error:
dlls/mshtml/htmlstyle.c
Event var_deref_model: Variable "v" tracked as NULL was passed to a
function that dereferences i
Hi Dan,
> 873 FORWARD_NULLHTMLStyle_put_fontWeight
> dlls/mshtml/htmlstyle.c
NULL is a valid value to be passed though to gecko.
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Congrats to everyone who's been cleaning up Coverity warnings,
especially Marcus (http://marcusmeissner.livejournal.com/24466.html).
Here are the yet-uninspected warnings that are in the Feb 7 run
but not in the Jan 30 run:
884 REVERSE_INULL compile_file_regex dlls/dbghelp/symbol.c
883
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:44:45PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
>> reports since the end of October.
>
> And there is now Run 278 :)
>
> Ciao, Marcus
Hi,
We even have a run 280 now but it
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17112
>> Should we make that a release criterion?
>
> I don't think so, getting access to that info is troublesome, and we
> can't easily trigger new test runs. We don't want to have the release
>
Dan Kegel writes:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Marcus Meissner
> wrote:
>>> David promised me we get even more issues reported once we get to rung2 :).
>>> The engine they use for rung2 is new and better apparently.
>>
>> I see it with gphoto2 for instance.
>>
>> However, what was the cri
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> David promised me we get even more issues reported once we get to rung2 :).
>> The engine they use for rung2 is new and better apparently.
>
> I see it with gphoto2 for instance.
>
> However, what was the criteria again for rung2? 0 unrevi
On Saturday 24 January 2009 12:24:29 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> > Dan Kegel wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner
wrote:
> >>> There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
> >>
> >> Whoops,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner
>> wrote:
>>> There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
>>
>> Whoops, right, I only got the first page, I guess. Here's a more complete
>
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner
> wrote:
>> There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
>
> Whoops, right, I only got the first page, I guess. Here's a more complete
> list.
David promised me we get even more issues reported once we
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
Whoops, right, I only got the first page, I guess. Here's a more complete list.
For more info, get a coverity account at
http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
or a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:42:38PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> ... and here are the new issues since the last run, all of type FORWARD_NULL.
> If you don't have coverity access, see
> http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
> for how to get it.
>
> 595 CryptDecodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/d
... and here are the new issues since the last run, all of type FORWARD_NULL.
If you don't have coverity access, see
http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
for how to get it.
595 CryptDecodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/decode.c
596 CryptEncodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/encode.c
549 S
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:44:45PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
> reports since the end of October.
And there is now Run 278 :)
Ciao, Marcus
Hi,
I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
reports since the end of October.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Do you have coverity access? if so we can make all these ignore.
If not then tell me and I will go in and mark them ignore.
-aric
Rob Shearman wrote:
> 2008/10/6 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thanks to the half-dozen Wine developers attacking the Coverity
>> warnings, we are slowly making p
2008/10/6 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks to the half-dozen Wine developers attacking the Coverity
> warnings, we are slowly making progress.
>
> Here are the warnings that were new as of October 1st
> and which have not yet been classified.
> They fall into five areas (four DLLs and one ki
Thanks to the half-dozen Wine developers attacking the Coverity
warnings, we are slowly making progress.
Here are the warnings that were new as of October 1st
and which have not yet been classified.
They fall into five areas (four DLLs and one kind of generated code):
CID Checker
20 matches
Mail list logo
