Hi!
I still need help on this case, any advice is appreciated.
2009/4/25 Igor Tarasov :
> Hi!
>
> I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
> write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
> see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. Bu
2009/4/25 Detlef Riekenberg :
>> Now, if you do TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, you'll see the difference. builtin
>> comctl will return 17,16. Native - 30,16.
> Did you mean TB_GETBUTTONSIZE?
Yes, of course. That was a typo.
> Native comctl32 in Wine or native on Windows?
Both. They both behave the same way
Hi Igor
> I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
> write this all down as conformance tests,
Thanks for your work on comctl32
> TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 20,20
> TB_SETBUTTONSIZE 30,30
> TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 10,10
>
> Now, if you do TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, you'll see the difference. b
Igor Tarasov wrote:
Hi!
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. But when I
repeat it in testcase, it won't work. Here is how you can reproduce
Hi!
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. But when I
repeat it in testcase, it won't work. Here is how you can reproduce
it:
TB_SETBITMAPSIZE
