Re: More cygwin breakage

2004-02-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:07:22PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: >"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>This fix looks reasonable. I've checked it in with some minor >>formatting tweaks and a new changelog. > >Thank you very much for such a quick response. Could you please also >have

Re: More cygwin breakage

2004-02-22 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This fix looks reasonable. I've checked it in with some minor formatting > tweaks and a new changelog. Thank you very much for such a quick response. Could you please also have a look at the .def file parser used by dlltool and probably add suppo

Re: More cygwin breakage

2004-02-21 Thread Steven Edwards
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:13:38AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > >I've found and fixed a bug in dlltool preventing exporting non-named > >and forwarded DLL entries. > > > >The patch is attached. > > > >Changelog: > >2004-02-22 Dmitry Timoshko

Re: More cygwin breakage

2004-02-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:13:38AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: >I've found and fixed a bug in dlltool preventing exporting non-named >and forwarded DLL entries. > >The patch is attached. > >Changelog: >2004-02-22 Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* dlltool.c (gen_exp_file): Even not

Re: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-21 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed. Sure someone will have to do > that work, but it's much better than hiding the problem by adding > extra code to Wine. Just to make you all know: I've found and fixed a bug in dlltool preventing exporting n

Re: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course that's a preferrable solution, but unfortunately > not a trivial one. I fixed a similar bug in dlltool some > time ago and know what I'm talking about. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed. Sure someone will have to do that work, but i

Re: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-19 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Uwe Bonnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert> Why not just change winebuild to do something like this: #ifdef > Robert> BROKEN_MINGW_LD print_normal(...); #else print_noname(...); > Robert> #endif > > What about fixing MingW? Of course that's a preferrable solution, but unfortuna

RE: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-19 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Robert" == Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Apparently it's a bug in dlltool (or ld) which can't handle forwards >> with NONAME modifier like this one: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] @415 NONAME >> >> A workaround is to create a thunk in the code like it wa

RE: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-19 Thread Robert Shearman
> > Apparently it's a bug in dlltool (or ld) which can't handle forwards > with NONAME modifier like this one: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] @415 NONAME > > A workaround is to create a thunk in the code like it was done > before the following patch: > > http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=11142 Why not

Re: More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-19 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comctl32.exp(.edata+0x6ac):fake: undefined reference to `f1' > comctl32.exp(.edata+0x6b0):fake: undefined reference to `f2' > comctl32.exp(.edata+0x6b4):fake: undefined reference to `f3' > comctl32.exp(.edata+0x6b8):fake: undefined reference to `f4' >

More Cygwin breakage

2004-02-18 Thread Steven Edwards
Hello, The getopt patch works great. I can build most of the dlls now except I am getting this error in comctl32. Maybe its related? Or could it be from the new winebuild changes? This is from current CVS. Thanks Steven dllwrap -k --def comctl32.spec.def -o comctl32.dll rsrc.res.o animate.o comb