Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
>Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10-summary.txt
>> ... today's git is probably about as Valgrind-clean as Saturday's.
>
>From todays list there isn't a memory leak in vg-shlwapi_string.txt
>from but on the 8th there w
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10-summary.txt
>> seems to show lots of valgrind regressions in mshtml, but
>> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10/vg-mshtml_dom-diff.txt
>> shows the difference is that I happen to have insta
Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10-summary.txt
> seems to show lots of valgrind regressions in mshtml, but
> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10/vg-mshtml_dom-diff.txt
> shows the difference is that I happen to have installed Gecko.
> So they aren't really
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10-summary.txt
seems to show lots of valgrind regressions in mshtml, but
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10/vg-mshtml_dom-diff.txt
shows the difference is that I happen to have installed Gecko.
So they aren't really regressions (or if there ar
