Re: Makedll.rules.in: Explicitly specify DLL name when building importlib

2013-01-31 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Jacek Caban writes: > The above is not really a reason to put it in Wine. However, I thought > that this behaviour is logical consequence of having MODULE and > IMPORTLIB separately in Makefiles (as opposed to, say, IMPORTLIB=1 and > using MODULE for its name), so I sent the patch. IMPORTLIB can

Re: Makedll.rules.in: Explicitly specify DLL name when building importlib

2013-01-31 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/30/13 20:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Jacek Caban writes: > >> --- >> dlls/Makedll.rules.in | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Why do you need this? My use case is not really valid as is for Wine. I was experimenting with running parts of Wine on Windows, b

Re: Makedll.rules.in: Explicitly specify DLL name when building importlib

2013-01-30 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Jacek Caban writes: > --- > dlls/Makedll.rules.in | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Why do you need this? -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org