On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:33:28AM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Andreas Mohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:05:49PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Changelog:
> > > Dmi
"Andreas Mohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:05:49PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Changelog:
> > Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Make more of the OLE interface vtables
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 20:49 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> So, does anybody know what seems to be wrong with winegcc or why it
> chose to do that?
winegcc is just a wrapper around gcc, it just passes stuff on to the
native compiler. I doubt it's because of that (unless some of the
additional options
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:05:49PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Changelog:
> Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Make more of the OLE interface vtables const.
You do know that those will *not* end up const?
filemoniker.c:static co
