Mike McCormack wrote:
I have some code for the mailslot implementation, but it's weekend
work for me. It would be pretty easy to wrap the test in a
todo_wine{} but we already know that none of the tests will pass, so
it won't prove much.
I think I'll just wait until I have an implementation
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Mike McCormack wrote:
[...]
> I have some code for the mailslot implementation, but it's weekend work
> for me. It would be pretty easy to wrap the test in a todo_wine{} but
> we already know that none of the tests will pass, so it won't prove much.
>
> I think I'll just wait
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Why not include it as a todo_wine{} in the tree? (if you are far away
with your mailslot impl, if not, I guess it can wait for it).
I have some code for the mailslot implementation, but it's weekend work
for me. It would be pretty easy to wrap the test in a todo_wine{} bu
On October 14, 2003 07:59 am, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Just incase anybody is interested, here is a regression test for
> mailslots. There's not much point to include it into Wine until we
> support mailslots properly (which I'm working on).
Why not include it as a todo_wine{} in the tree? (if you
Hi,
Just incase anybody is interested, here is a regression test for
mailslots. There's not much point to include it into Wine until we
support mailslots properly (which I'm working on).
Mike
/*
* Mailslot regression test
*
* Copyright 2003 Mike McCormack
*/
#include
#include
#defin
