Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

* On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote: > > Ok folks, but my hands are off. I just reported for everybody to know. > I am going to upgrade libxml2 packages (to v2.6.16). Heh.. I opened this message to discard it. That Ctrl-C combination is so near to a Ctrl-X. Sorry for a noise, igno

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

* On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Mike McCormack wrote: > > If you don't use xmlReadIO, then you could use xmlReadMemory I guess. > The whole file would need to be read into memory first. * On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > > Or just mmap'ed. That could be a reasonable workaround. Ok folks,

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it's older than the version of libxml2 I'm using here, which is > libxml2-2.6.19-i686-1dl for slackware. If you don't use xmlReadIO, then > you could use xmlReadMemory I guess. The whole file would need to be > read into memory first. Or

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

Hi, --- Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it's older than the version of libxml2 I'm using here, which is > > libxml2-2.6.19-i686-1dl for slackware. If you don't use xmlReadIO, then > > you could use xmlReadMemory I guess. The whole file would need to be > > read into memo

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

"Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | /usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/conftest.c:130: undefined reference to `xmlReadIO' > > > $ rpm -qf $(locate libxml/parser.h) > > libxml2-devel-2.5.11-0.fdr.1.rh80 > > > > Is it too old? > > Well, it's older than the version of libxml2 I'm using here, whi

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

Saulius Krasuckas wrote: | /usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/conftest.c:130: undefined reference to `xmlReadIO' $ rpm -qf $(locate libxml/parser.h) libxml2-devel-2.5.11-0.fdr.1.rh80 Is it too old? Well, it's older than the version of libxml2 I'm using here, which is libxml2-2.6.19-i686-1dl for slac

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

* On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Mike McCormack wrote: > > I think that the problem is your libxml2 library is not being detected > properly. You might check that in the config.log. Oh yes, one test fails here: | configure:8883: checking for xmlReadIO in -lxml2 | configure:8913: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

Saulius Krasuckas wrote: bash-3.00$ grep XML2INCL config.status config.log dlls/msxml3/Makefile.in config.status:s,@XML2INCL@,-I/usr/include/libxml2,;t t config.status:s,@XML2INCL@,,;t t I think that the problem is your libxml2 library is not being detected properly. You might check tha

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

* On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Mike McCormack wrote: > > Could you try running ./configure again I did it several times already. > and checking for XML2INCL in config.status and config.log? This is the > output on my machine: Pasted inline: > bash-3.00$ grep XML2INCL config.status config.log dlls/ms

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

Saulius Krasuckas wrote: $ grep -Ir ^EXTRAINCL dlls/msxml3/ | dlls/msxml3/Makefile:EXTRAINCL = | dlls/msxml3/Makefile.in:EXTRAINCL = @XML2INCL@ Is this supposed to be so? My makefile have empty EXTRAINCL var. Why? No. Could you try running ./configure again and checking for XML2INCL in

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

* On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Mike McCormack wrote: > > This patch is a start on msxml3. I think I am stuck with an error with this patch in the CVS tree: | make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/antras/usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/dlls/msxml3' | gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -DC

Re: MSXML3: initial implementation based on libxml2

Hi, On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:39:48PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > > This patch is a start on msxml3. More implementation to follow. Nice! I need that one... Andreas