Re: MSVCRT printf functions

2005-01-06 Thread Mike McCormack
Aneurin Price wrote: I've gone over this patch again, fixed any bugs I could find, and tried to address the points made regarding readability. Hopefully the coding style should now be much improved, so could anyone who knows about such things give it a look over? Well, it looks nicer, but it p

Re: MSVCRT printf functions

2005-01-06 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Aneurin, some style comments on your patch: +<<< file.c +=== This shouldn't be in your patch. +typedef struct +{ +int flags; +unsigned int width; +__int64 precision; +const MSVCRT_wchar_t *input; +MSVCRT_wchar_t *output; +int HeapAlloced; +union +{ +

MSVCRT printf functions

2005-01-06 Thread Aneurin Price
I've gone over this patch again, fixed any bugs I could find, and tried to address the points made regarding readability. Hopefully the coding style should now be much improved, so could anyone who knows about such things give it a look over? If there's not too much of a problem there I'll fix

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-28 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike Hearn wrote: On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:37:21 +, Aneurin Price wrote: Thanks for that; it's just the kind of comment I was looking for. It wasn't a full patch as I wasn't planning to get it applied, and a number of points were where I copied code from what was there already :), but you even

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-27 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:37:21 +, Aneurin Price wrote: > So, I've had a go over this all, and here is a new version. Is it a step > in the right direction? I still don't really know what I should be doing > to improve this. Yep, that's a lot better. There is still room for improvement though:

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-27 Thread Aneurin Price
Well I recently got re-motivated, by forgetting I was using an unpatched version of Wine, and getting my WC3 campaign file nuked :(. So, I've had a go over this all, and here is a new version. Is it a step in the right direction? I still don't really know what I should be doing to improve this.

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-18 Thread Jesse Allen
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:16:02PM +, Aneurin Price wrote: > I don't really understand what it is you want, but I think I'm going to > have to give up on this for the moment, until I get enough time to get > more coding practice. > Aneurin Price If you don't mind, I will take up hacking it.

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-18 Thread Aneurin Price
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Any further comments on this? Hard to say, that code is really painful to read. Please try to better follow the coding conventions used in the rest of the code. Apologies for long delay; I've been playing World of Warcraft for th

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-08 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any further comments on this? Hard to say, that code is really painful to read. Please try to better follow the coding conventions used in the rest of the code. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-08 Thread Aneurin Price
Any further comments on this?

Re: Some conformance tests for msvcrt printf functions

2004-11-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any particular reason this patch hasn't been committed? > Something wrong or just overlooked? You should implement the format strings in a way that the compiler cannot check in order to avoid the warnings. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Some conformance tests for msvcrt printf functions

2004-11-02 Thread Aneurin Price
Is there any particular reason this patch hasn't been committed? Something wrong or just overlooked?