Jesse Allen wrote:
Sorry for being late at responding. I took a look at it finally like
a week ago. You can definately break up the patch.
Erm, nevermind on breaking it up yet. I started to myself, but I
think it's more trouble than it's worth right now. We can have that
done later if tha
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:18:40 -0700, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:48:12 +, Aneurin Price
> >
> > Nobody has any comments about this?
> >
> >
>
> Sorry for being late at responding. I took a look at it finally like
> a week ago. You can definately break up t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:48:12 +, Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changelog:
>
> > Re-implement all *printf functions in msvcrt.dll, according to
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt_format_specification_fields_.2d_.printf_and_wprintf_fu
Hi Aneurin,
> Nobody has any comments about this?
Well, I held off thinking I'd give Alexandre a chance to chime in. As
it's a large patch, I knew it could take a while. But since he hasn't..
My advice isn't going to be as specific as it has been in the past.
You've obviously done a lot on th
Changelog:
Re-implement all *printf functions in msvcrt.dll, according to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt_format_specification_fields_.2d_.printf_and_wprintf_functions.asp
and descriptions of appropriate functions.
This should fix, among other thi
Juan Lang wrote:
Style point: (*pointer).whatever is written a bit more easily as
pointer->whatever. That'd make your new patch a good bit more readable.
--Juan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/
On January 7, 2005 09:04 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:46:25 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> > Style point: (*pointer).whatever is written a bit more easily as
> > pointer->whatever. That'd make your new patch a good bit more readable.
>
> Are they even equivalent? My impression was th
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:46:25 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> Style point: (*pointer).whatever is written a bit more easily as
> pointer->whatever. That'd make your new patch a good bit more readable.
Are they even equivalent? My impression was that (*pointer).whatever would
make a temporary copy on th
Style point: (*pointer).whatever is written a bit more easily as
pointer->whatever. That'd make your new patch a good bit more readable.
--Juan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/
