On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:27 PM, John Emmas wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:17, Bruno Jesus wrote:
>>> ...
>>> BACKTRACE FOLLOWS:-
>>> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
>>> msvcp60.dll.??0Init@ios_base@std@@QAE@XZ called in 32-bit code (0x7
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:17, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:38 PM, John Emmas wrote:
>> ...
>> BACKTRACE FOLLOWS:-
>> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
>> msvcp60.dll.??0Init@ios_base@std@@QAE@XZ called in 32-bit code (0x7b83aed2).
>
> Th
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:38 PM, John Emmas wrote:
> If anyone thinks of any useful information I'll add it to the bug report.
> ...
> BACKTRACE FOLLOWS:-
> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
> msvcp60.dll.??0Init@ios_base@std@@QAE@XZ called in 32-bit code (0x7b83aed
On 15 Jun 2012, at 10:41, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2012 06:22 AM, John Emmas wrote:
>>
>> Recently however, two customers tried to use it with Wine v1.5.35. In
>> both cases the program crashed - apparently because some particular
>> function wasn&
of Wine was about v0.9.58.
>>> Over a hundred people are using my program with old versions of Wine and
>>> I've had no complaints so far.
>>>
>>> Recently however, two customers tried to use it with Wine v1.5.35. In
>>> both cases the program crashed -
e and
>> I've had no complaints so far.
>>
>> Recently however, two customers tried to use it with Wine v1.5.35. In
>> both cases the program crashed - apparently because some particular
>> function wasn't found in MSVCP60.dll (at the moment, we don't
ed to use it with Wine v1.5.35. In
> both cases the program crashed - apparently because some particular
> function wasn't found in MSVCP60.dll (at the moment, we don't know which
> function). Both customers went to a web site called WineTricks from
That is fairly trivial to fi
some particular function wasn't
found in MSVCP60.dll (at the moment, we don't know which function). Both
customers went to a web site called WineTricks from where they were able to
install an alternative version of MSVCP60.dll. My app now gets past the place
where it previously crashe
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 14:08 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
> > Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)
>
> It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me.
Evolution 2.2.1.1 here and i had a similar problem with my Patches:
I used UTF-8 in as the
Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +, Molle Bestefich a écrit :
> > Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)
>
> It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me.
I'll agree that the GUI is pretty good.
The MIME assembly lacks s
Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +, Molle Bestefich a écrit :
> Tony Lambregts wrote:
[...]
> > Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this???
>
> I assume it's Jonathan's mailer, since I can't find any good reasons
> why gmane would do this.
>
> Jonathan, what software do you use, if yo
Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Now the question remains (now that we know it is archived) how do would
> one actually find it
>
> http://search.gmane.org/
I'm leaving now, but I'll check this out later.
If I remember :-).
> > If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to
> >
Molle Bestefich wrote:
Tony Lambregts wrote:
attached is the message source that I got throught gmane news server.
Thanks.
gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does,
so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-).
Please take a look...
(I do
Tony Lambregts wrote:
> attached is the message source that I got throught gmane news server.
Thanks.
gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does,
so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-).
Please take a look...
> (I do not get emails from wine patches ev
tiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL?
[FIXED]
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:05:21 +0100
Lines: 146
Approved: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: wine-devel@winehq.or
Tony Lambregts wrote:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html
Looks odd with all the MIME in there.
> So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of
> GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all.
GMANE snips stuff with X-No-Archive
the Devel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place.
With regard to the latest patch post by "Jonathan Ernst", Nabble shows
it should be Jan 16, 2006.
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-MSVCP60.DLL--t927107.html#a2402419
You can simply click
vel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place.
With regard to the latest patch post by "Jonathan Ernst", Nabble shows it should be Jan 16, 2006. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-MSVCP60.DLL--t927107.html#a2402419
You can simply click the user name
yone got any ideas on how to fix this.
--
Tony Lambregts
Jonathan Ernst wrote:
Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 à 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a écrit :
On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
but until we repackage the s
Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 à 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a écrit :
> On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
> > > but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> > >
On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
> > but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 ...
> > I could have sworn I s
Dan Kegel wrote:
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool
and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include
MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their
heads as to why it keeps asking where its files ar
> From: Boaz Harrosh
>
> Hi! I was Just wondering. Is there at all a MinGW build
> system for the "Mozilla ActiveX control"? I guess not so the
> Question is:
> Any body knows what are the Main hurdles for that? Is that mainly COM
> TLB(s) related? or there are other problems?
I've built Firefo
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Hi! I was Just wondering. Is there at all a MinGW build system for the
"Mozilla ActiveX control"? I guess not so the Question is:
Any body knows what are the Main hurdles for that? Is that mainly COM
TLB(s) related? or there are other problems?
There's a bug in Mozilla.org
Kegel
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all, but
until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their heads as to why it
keeps asking where its files are.
I could h
> From: Dan Kegel
>
> The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all, but
> until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
> it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their heads as to why it
&
--- Begin Message ---
Dan Kegel wrote:
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool
and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include
MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their
heads as to why it keeps a
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool
and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include
MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their
heads as to why it keeps asking where its files are.
I could have sw
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Is there any work at all on msvcp60.dll? I haven't seen much mention
of it on the lists, and it's not listed on the dll status page. I've
found at least one (and heard of more) that require this dll outright,
though.
Thoughts?
msvcp60.dll is a C++
Is there any work at all on msvcp60.dll? I haven't seen much mention of
it on the lists, and it's not listed on the dll status page. I've found
at least one (and heard of more) that require this dll outright, though.
Thoughts?
--
Joel Konkle-Parker
Webmaster [Ballsome.com]
E-
eric lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks your reply and point out. I will try to search web somewhere
>to get it for running my.exe file by wine. (or point me some place
>in web I can get it)
>
> or anyone have other alternative, please inform me.
Well if you have written that program an
--- Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>try:
>
>http://www.dll-files.com/dllindex/dll-files.shtml?msvcp60
>
>eric lin wrote:
>
>>Dear wine-devel programers:
>>
>> MSVCP60.DLL some say is runtime dll that must need window license version.
--
--- "Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Behalf Of eric lin
>> Sent: 08 September 2003 22:57
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of eric lin
> Sent: 08 September 2003 22:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MSVCP60.DLL missing, please help
>
>
> Dear wine-devel programers:
>
> MSVCP60.DLL some
Dear wine-devel programers:
MSVCP60.DLL some say is runtime dll that must need window license version. Does
anyone have some way to get around that so no-window user still can run that exe
program. I am in rh9 platform.
highly appreciate your tech help, and looking to hear from you soon
35 matches
Mail list logo
