Kuba Ober wrote:
Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Kuba Ober wrote:
> > > I'm annoyed that .wine is inaccessible through KDE and Gnome apps.
> >
> > It is accessible all right. You just don't know how to get there.
>
> Please insert relevant context when quoting. You're obviously
> misrepresenting what I
On Thursday 08 June 2006 09:02, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Kuba Ober wrote:
> > > I'm annoyed that .wine is inaccessible through KDE and Gnome apps.
> >
> > It is accessible all right. You just don't know how to get there.
>
> Please insert relevant context when quoting. You're obviously
> misrepres
Kuba Ober wrote:
> I'm annoyed that .wine is inaccessible through KDE and Gnome apps.
It is accessible all right. You just don't know how to get there.
Please insert relevant context when quoting. You're obviously
misrepresenting what I said, turning it into something completely
else, and the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:17:12AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> I'm sure Gnome has something similar, but I don't use it so I didn't bother
> looking the key up.
>
> I.e. no big deal.
>
> Cheers, Kuba
Andreas Mohr
> I'm annoyed that .wine is inaccessible through KDE and Gnome apps.
It is accessible all right. You just don't know how to get there.
> Not through the file manager, but often in various applications.
nope. Unless you're talking about some very broken applications that I didn't
come across yet
Molle Bestefich wrote:
Peter Beutner wrote:
Because it is the defacto standard to store settings
under ~/..
Only for stuff that's thought to be generally uninteresting.
well, speaking of system.reg, user.reg and dosdevices/, I think they
are "generally uninteresting".
And if you mangle with t
GTK dialogs can always show hidden folders, just right click and click
"Show Hidden Folders."
Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Neil Skrypuch wrote:
>> I can't say I've ever seen that. What apps in particular?
>
> Can't remember offhand.
> I was annoyed enough by it to create the symlink at one point.
>
>>
Neil Skrypuch wrote:
I can't say I've ever seen that. What apps in particular?
Can't remember offhand.
I was annoyed enough by it to create the symlink at one point.
Both the standard Qt open file dialog and the Gtk open file dialog work fine
with . directories for me, which doesn't leave man
On Tuesday, June 06, 2006 17:53, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Neil Skrypuch wrote:
> > You can always type .wine in to access it, even if it isn't visible.
>
> No. Some apps break when you do that.
> Either they don't access the folder correctly, or they close or
> activate the selection dialog.
I ca
On Tuesday, June 06, 2006 17:53, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Neil Skrypuch wrote:
> > You can always type .wine in to access it, even if it isn't visible.
>
> No. Some apps break when you do that.
> Either they don't access the folder correctly, or they close or
> activate the selection dialog.
I ca
Molle Bestefich wrote:
No. Some apps break when you do that.
Either they don't access the folder correctly, or they close or
activate the selection dialog.
The symlink workaround works fine though.
My main argument was that hidden folders is an ugly workaround for bad
directory structure.
Neil Skrypuch wrote:
You can always type .wine in to access it, even if it isn't visible.
No. Some apps break when you do that.
Either they don't access the folder correctly, or they close or
activate the selection dialog.
On Tuesday, June 06, 2006 13:42, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> I'm annoyed that .wine is inaccessible through KDE and Gnome apps.
You can always type .wine in to access it, even if it isn't visible.
- Neil
Peter Beutner wrote:
Because it is the defacto standard to store settings
under ~/..
Only for stuff that's thought to be generally uninteresting.
Your KDE desktop, for example, resides under ~/Desktop.
And with enough applications installed that use this "standard"
you probably will be glad
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:27:52 +, NikNot wrote:
> Indeed! This is something that I found infuriating since I first
> used wine. What possible reason would there be to make this
> a "hidden" directory? From whom exactly should it be hidden
> and why?
Historical reasons. I'm switching this thread
15 matches
Mail list logo
