Re: Quick license question for teapot

2010-07-19 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Misha Koshelev wrote: > Dear All: > > Sorry to bother - apparently Owen Rudge has done quite a bit of basic > texture work, so I will await his patches to start my texture work. > > As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: > http://www.w

Re: Quick license question for teapot

2010-07-19 Thread Misha Koshelev
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 20:49 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am 19.07.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Misha Koshelev: > > As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: > > http://www.winehq.org/license > > GPL 2.1 > Actually, it is LGPL 2.1. > > I don't know the definite answer to your

Re: Quick license question for teapot

2010-07-19 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am 19.07.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Misha Koshelev: > As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: > http://www.winehq.org/license > GPL 2.1 Actually, it is LGPL 2.1. I don't know the definite answer to your real question though, and I'll abstain from spreading suspicions :-)

Re: Quick license question for teapot

2010-07-19 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 19 July 2010 20:33, Misha Koshelev wrote: > As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: > http://www.winehq.org/license > GPL 2.1 > Well, Wine is LGPL 2.1 or later. I didn't say you *should* look at freeglut, just that freeglut is probably safer to look at than GLUT. (A

Quick license question for teapot

2010-07-19 Thread Misha Koshelev
Dear All: Sorry to bother - apparently Owen Rudge has done quite a bit of basic texture work, so I will await his patches to start my texture work. As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: http://www.winehq.org/license GPL 2.1 Freeglut is "freeglut is released under t

Re: License question

2006-05-22 Thread Aneurin Price
Kai Blin wrote: Actually going that way is not really problematic. Linking to LGPL code from GPL code is fine. To expand upon that, I'd like to quote a passage from the text of the LGPL: "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to

Re: License question

2006-05-22 Thread Kai Blin
* Yuriy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22/05/06, 15:58:28]: > I might be making a configuration module for wine for KDE System Settings > based on winecfg as a SoC project for Kubuntu, but I just realized that wine > is LGPL and my project would have to be GPL, so I need to know how to > reconcile that. An

Re: License question

2006-05-22 Thread Brian Vincent
On 5/22/06, Yuriy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I might be making a configuration module for wine for KDE System Settings based on winecfg as a SoC project for Kubuntu, but I just realized that wine is LGPL and my project would have to be GPL, so I need to know how to reconcile that. Any input ASA

Re: License question

2006-05-22 Thread Joseph Garvin
Yuriy wrote: > Hi, > > I might be making a configuration module for wine for KDE System > Settings based on winecfg as a SoC project for Kubuntu, but I just > realized that wine is LGPL and my project would have to be GPL, so I > need to know how to reconcile that. Any input ASAP would be greatly

License question

2006-05-22 Thread Yuriy
Hi, I might be making a configuration module for wine for KDE System Settings based on winecfg as a SoC project for Kubuntu, but I just realized that wine is LGPL and my project would have to be GPL, so I need to know how to reconcile that.  Any input ASAP would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,Y