Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-06 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"jimtabor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Julien wrote: / I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos />/ and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are />/ implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail />/ is the lis

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread jimtabor
Julien wrote: / I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos />/ and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are />/ implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail />/ is the list of identified functions. />/ />/ One

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On 9/4/06, Brandon Mark Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it would be nice if everyone just left this thread alone for now. You guys made up your minds that you don't want our patches. And thats fine.But there is no reason to continue to express hateful opinions about ReactOS. I do

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Brandon Mark Turner
Dan Kegel writes: I doubt the audit is completed yet (these things are asymptotic; you can get to 90% complete a lot faster than 99% complete, etc.). I am not trying to be a jerk and I am not taking a shot at you personally. I actually think you are a good guy Dan so don't take this the wr

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On 9/4/06, Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW, can results of Wine's own audit process be seen somewhere on the web? Good question. I don't know the answer, but I'll see if I can find one. It would be nice to know at least what speed was Wine project audited and when did it hap

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread hippy hip
> I'm afraid it's the other way around at this > point - the burden of proof is on ReactOS to show > that their code is clean :-( A)-no offense, but this sounds like something SCO would say. if you got something (from reactOS current that is already audited..) that you can prove is dirty- please

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Dan Kegel wrote: > * On 9/4/06, Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > have you any proof of "all ReactOS code audit process being fake" ? > > The audit went awfully quickly, for one thing, > and it was done without a neutral third party. > Wine's been doing its own

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On 9/4/06, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry Mike but from an external point of view your argument sounds like ideology: 1) I dont understand why someone contributing to ReactOS would have his/her code rejected in all cases. Contributing to ReactOS does not necessary means the code is "dirt

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Julien
Sorry Mike but from an external point of view your argument sounds like ideology: 1) I dont understand why someone contributing to ReactOS would have his/her code rejected in all cases. Contributing to ReactOS does not necessary means the code is "dirty" reverse engineering. 2) The author stressed

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On 9/4/06, Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, Dmitry and Mike, this sound very probable, but have you any proof of "all ReactOS code audit process being fake" ? The audit went awfully quickly, for one thing, and it was done without a neutral third party. Wine's been doing its ow

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > * "Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks to me like reverse engineered code is "not permitted for > > inclusion in ReactOS" so how is it there participating in "dirty" > > reverse engineering? > > That's just a declaration supposed to

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks to me like reverse engineered code is "not permitted for inclusion in ReactOS" so how is it there participating in "dirty" reverse engineering? That's just a declaration supposed to create a better face on public, nothing more to take it seriousl

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-04 Thread Tom Wickline
On 9/3/06, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Code that originates in ReactOS will generally not be accepted into Wine due to that project's acceptance of developers that participate in "dirty" reverse engineering (ie. translating assembly code to C). ?? From : http://www.reactos.or

Re: LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-03 Thread Mike McCormack
Julien wrote: I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail is the list of identified functions. One may note that most of

LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

2006-09-02 Thread Julien
Hello all, I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail is the list of identified functions. One may note that most of these