Jesse Allen a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN wrote:
from what I read from Linus / Roland discussion on this topic (this night) on
lkml, Linus only patched 1 out of 3 places which need to be patched (according
to Roland). But I don't know yet if Linus wi
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:57:53 -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few
> things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've
> trie
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:24:46AM -0500, Paul Rupe wrote:
> No luck with Remedy either. I tried reversing all three patches and also
> tried 2.6.10-rc2. Same crash as before.
>
>
OK, too bad it didn't work. I thought it might because you had traced it to
the same kernels. My last thought
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN wrote:
> from what I read from Linus / Roland discussion on this topic (this night) on
> lkml, Linus only patched 1 out of 3 places which need to be patched
> (according to Roland). But I don't know yet if Linus will finish the jo
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few
> things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've
> tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 rever
7;t single step in signal handler if the process itself has set the TF flag, but do if the debugger has done it), however I cannot tell whether it's going to fix all issues.A+
> Message du 16/11/04 02:15> De : "Jesse Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> A : [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:45:00PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
> > links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=1100484293
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
> links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=2
That's a brand new patch today.
"x86: only single-step in
I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=2
--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See
http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> > Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
> > Included in 2.6.9-rc1
> > By Davide Libenzi?
>
> corrected link:
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:16:39 +0100, Eric Pouech wrote:
> IMO, the best option would be to add an option to turn on/off the behavior in
> ptrace (to allow or not single stepping in signal handlers).
I've emailed the kernel guys about this possibility.
Jesse Allen a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
Included in 2.6.9-rc1
By Davide Libenzi?
corrected link:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This shall harm us...
Basically, when a program is traced by
On Saturday November 13 2004 07:23 pm, Jesse Allen wrote:
> Now that I've identified a problem, I'm curious where else it's cropping
> up. Paul Rupe, could you try reversing these patches to see if this fixes
> your crashing problem? And how about those people having trouble with
> debugging?
Th
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
> Included in 2.6.9-rc1
> By Davide Libenzi?
corrected link:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
For the past two weeks I've been tracking an issue that I found with kernels
greater than 2.6.8 / 2.6.8.1 and wine. Starting with kernel 2.6.9-rc1,
Warcraft III copy protection would not work -- ie please insert disc. I found
changes to the cdrom driver in rc1. Reversing them did not wor
15 matches
Mail list logo
