Jesse Allen a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN wrote:
from what I read from Linus / Roland discussion on this topic (this night) on
lkml, Linus only patched 1 out of 3 places which need to be patched (according
to Roland). But I don't know yet if Linus wi
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:57:53 -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few
> things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've
> trie
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:24:46AM -0500, Paul Rupe wrote:
> No luck with Remedy either. I tried reversing all three patches and also
> tried 2.6.10-rc2. Same crash as before.
>
>
OK, too bad it didn't work. I thought it might because you had traced it to
the same kernels. My last thought
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN wrote:
> from what I read from Linus / Roland discussion on this topic (this night) on
> lkml, Linus only patched 1 out of 3 places which need to be patched
> (according to Roland). But I don't know yet if Linus will finish the jo
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few
> things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've
> tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 rever
7;t single step in signal handler if the process itself has set the TF flag, but do if the debugger has done it), however I cannot tell whether it's going to fix all issues.A+
> Message du 16/11/04 02:15> De : "Jesse Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> A : [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:45:00PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
> > links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=1100484293
Paul Rupe wrote:
> On Friday November 12 2004 11:48 am, Michael
Stefaniuc wrote:
>
>
>>Btw. does wine crash only with Remedy or does
winemine crash too?
>
>
> Most apps (winemine included) are ok. When I get
home I'll try to find a
> downloadable app that reproduces the problem
consistently.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
> links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=2
That's a brand new patch today.
"x86: only single-step in
I couldn't find the patch at either of the two
links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=2
--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See
http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> > Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
> > Included in 2.6.9-rc1
> > By Davide Libenzi?
>
> corrected link:
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:16:39 +0100, Eric Pouech wrote:
> IMO, the best option would be to add an option to turn on/off the behavior in
> ptrace (to allow or not single stepping in signal handlers).
I've emailed the kernel guys about this possibility.
Jesse Allen a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
Included in 2.6.9-rc1
By Davide Libenzi?
corrected link:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This shall harm us...
Basically, when a program is traced by
On Saturday November 13 2004 07:23 pm, Jesse Allen wrote:
> Now that I've identified a problem, I'm curious where else it's cropping
> up. Paul Rupe, could you try reversing these patches to see if this fixes
> your crashing problem? And how about those people having trouble with
> debugging?
Th
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix
> Included in 2.6.9-rc1
> By Davide Libenzi?
corrected link:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
For the past two weeks I've been tracking an issue that I found with kernels
greater than 2.6.8 / 2.6.8.1 and wine. Starting with kernel 2.6.9-rc1,
Warcraft III copy protection would not work -- ie please insert disc. I found
changes to the cdrom driver in rc1. Reversing them di
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:47:57 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> Most apps (winemine included) are ok. When I get home I'll try to find a
>> > downloadable app that reproduces the problem consistently.
>> >
>> > Usually wine just hangs until I kill -9 everything, but this time I managed
>> > to get a st
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I have seen errors where killed wine processes remained defunct even
after their parent has died. They were rebooted to init, but still
remained defunct. In certain (RedHat 2.4) kernels, such processes could
even keep sockets bound to ports, requiring a reboot.
I had zombi
Paul Rupe wrote:
Has anyone tried Wine with Linux kernel 2.6.9? I'm getting crashes with
this version that don't happen when I reboot back to 2.6.8.1. I haven't
had much luck debugging it so far, but each time, ps shows a
wine-preloader process and wineserver still running.
On Friday November 12 2004 07:46 pm, James Hawkins wrote:
> I google'd that error and found that I needed to make sure that my
> /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 pointed to the same thing
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 pointed to. After fixing this, I know
> longer have the crash.
I haven't gotten any errors
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:30:24 -0500, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:22:10 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >What could possibly be different between our systems that would cause
> > >this problem?
> > Anything but wine and the kernel, coul
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:22:10 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What could possibly be different between our systems that would cause
> >this problem?
> Anything but wine and the kernel, could you try this binary package and see if
> it works? Like this you can find out if it's a r
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:14:28 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I forgot to mention that I'm using latest wine CVS.
> So am I and wine works fine, on mdk 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk.
>
> Ivan.
>
>
> Libero ADSL: navighi
>What could possibly be different between our systems that would cause
>this problem?
Anything but wine and the kernel, could you try this binary package and see if
it works? Like this you can find out if it's a runtime or compile time problem.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-20041019-
> I forgot to mention that I'm using latest wine CVS.
So am I and wine works fine, on mdk 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk.
Ivan.
Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione.
Abbonati subito su http://www.lib
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:47:05 -0500, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:19:30 -0500, Paul Rupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Friday November 12 2004 11:48 am, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> >
> > > Btw. does wine crash only with Remedy or does winemine crash too?
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:19:30 -0500, Paul Rupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday November 12 2004 11:48 am, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>
> > Btw. does wine crash only with Remedy or does winemine crash too?
>
> Most apps (winemine included) are ok. When I get home I'll try to find a
> download
On Friday November 12 2004 11:48 am, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Btw. does wine crash only with Remedy or does winemine crash too?
Most apps (winemine included) are ok. When I get home I'll try to find a
downloadable app that reproduces the problem consistently.
Usually wine just hangs until I
error, not the cause of the crash itself.
err:seh:setup_exception stack overflow 644 bytes in thread 0009 eip
77ee762e esp 77830d7c stack 0x7783-0x7793
You could check if the glibc behaves differently under a kernel < 2.6.9.
Asked the Red Hat glibc maintainer and he said "mayb
I've got an app now that I can reliably provoke into crashing under 2.6.9,
but unfortunately it's our internal Remedy ticketing system. I'm running
on FC3 and I've tried both Redhat's 2.6.9-1.667 kernel and a plain 2.6.9 I
built from kernel.org.
There is a message in the log, but it may just b
I'm using Slackware 9.1/Linux 2.6.9, and I haven't seen anything out of
the usual. The CrossOver Wine tree that I'm using may be a little older
than the WineHQ cvs though (3-4 months), and Slackware doesn't use NPTL
as yet.
Mike
Paul Rupe wrote:
Has anyone tried Wine wit
Hi,
On Freitag 12 November 2004 14:58, Paul Rupe wrote:
> Has anyone tried Wine with Linux kernel 2.6.9? I'm getting crashes with
> this version that don't happen when I reboot back to 2.6.8.1. I haven't
> had much luck debugging it so far, but each time, ps shows a
Has anyone tried Wine with Linux kernel 2.6.9? I'm getting crashes with
this version that don't happen when I reboot back to 2.6.8.1. I haven't
had much luck debugging it so far, but each time, ps shows a
wine-preloader process and wineserver still running.
--
Paul
33 matches
Mail list logo
