On 11/14/2012 10:15 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
>> Would calculating the total number of 'row' calls and reading each row
>> as a 'block in turn be an alternate implementation?
>
> No, your terminology (what is a "row" in PNG?) shows lack of undertsanding
> of wha
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> Would calculating the total number of 'row' calls and reading each row
> as a 'block in turn be an alternate implementation?
No, your terminology (what is a "row" in PNG?) shows lack of undertsanding
of what is a block, or what that APIs are supposed to return. Star
On 11/14/2012 09:38 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
>>>
>>> Looks like you don't unde
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> >> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
> >> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
> >
> > Looks like you don't understand what those APIs do. What's that 'the whole
>
On 11/14/2012 07:03 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
>> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
>>
>> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
>> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
>
> Looks like you don't understand what
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
>
> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
Looks like you don't understand what those APIs do. What's that 'the whole
thing'?
--
Dmitry.
These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
