Re: Implement SetThreadPriority

2006-08-03 Thread Chris Robinson
On Thursday 03 August 2006 04:57, you wrote: > Allowing Windows > apps to use priorities that can hang the box is not acceptable, I can't help but think the kernel devs themselves disagree, since they explicitly added in this very "ability" for normal Linux apps (it's not like they can fully loc

Re: Implement SetThreadPriority

2006-08-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Chris Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there anything still wrong with this patch? I believe I've addressed the > concerns brought up before. If this patch is still unacceptable, what needs > to be done to make it acceptable? I explained the problem a number of times already. Allowing

Re: Implement SetThreadPriority

2006-08-03 Thread Chris Robinson
Is there anything still wrong with this patch? I believe I've addressed the concerns brought up before. If this patch is still unacceptable, what needs to be done to make it acceptable?

Re: Implement SetThreadPriority

2006-07-31 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
Chris Robinson wrote: > +// Use the minimum real-time priority possible for now (on Linux, > 1 for > +// SCHED_FIFO and 0 for SCHED_OTHER) I did not test the Patch, but C++ - Comments are not allowed in wine (not compatible with all compilers) It seems to be an updated Patch from Mike. I