On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> >"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This is a request to understand, not a suggestion (yet?).
> >>Why not use a general purpose DB system? (postgresql, mysql, whatever)
> >>After all, the registry is just a t
--- Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regardless at the moment wine startup time isn't a huge problem,
> certainly there are more pressing issues (like the lack of a good
> typelib compiler).
I like being able to edit the registry in vi also but if you guys need
a fast binary format, Eric Ko
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 10:25, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
Yeah, but nothing beats editing a registry file with Emacs (which is a joy
to do when, for example, a damn game refuses to re-install because it
detects some keys in the registry from its last installation).
Yeah, that's wh
On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 10:25, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> Yeah, but nothing beats editing a registry file with Emacs (which is a joy
> to do when, for example, a damn game refuses to re-install because it
> detects some keys in the registry from its last installation).
Yeah, that's why I said I wasn't go
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:25:14AM +0100, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> > What you gain - fast, efficient, Unicode aware manipulation. Data
> > integrity taken care for you. Concurrancy taken care for you. Seems too
> > good to be true, I think.
>
> Yeah, but nothing beats editing a registry file w
> What you gain - fast, efficient, Unicode aware manipulation. Data
> integrity taken care for you. Concurrancy taken care for you. Seems too
> good to be true, I think.
Yeah, but nothing beats editing a registry file with Emacs (which is a joy
to do when, for example, a damn game refuses to re-
First, I would like to mention that having binary compatible registry
implementation is not stricly necessary for load/save compatible to
Windows. We can do import on load and export on save, for example.
There is also the fact that, if I understand correctly, Windows 9x has
different registry
Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On Saturday 27 December 2003 09:23 am, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Mike Hearn wrote:
This implementation is a little inefficient but without using a random
access binary db as Windows does (which I am not going to advocate) it's
the best we can do.
Ok, I'm going
On Saturday 27 December 2003 09:23 am, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Mike Hearn wrote:
> >This implementation is a little inefficient but without using a random
> >access binary db as Windows does (which I am not going to advocate) it's
> >the best we can do.
>
> Ok, I'm going to be flamed for this, but
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a request to understand, not a suggestion (yet?).
Why not use a general purpose DB system? (postgresql, mysql, whatever)
After all, the registry is just a tree shaped database. We can do that
using standard SQL, and
"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a request to understand, not a suggestion (yet?).
> Why not use a general purpose DB system? (postgresql, mysql, whatever)
> After all, the registry is just a tree shaped database. We can do that
> using standard SQL, and fall back to our cu
Mike Hearn wrote:
This implementation is a little inefficient but without using a random
access binary db as Windows does (which I am not going to advocate) it's
the best we can do.
Ok, I'm going to be flamed for this, but I'm going to go ahead and ask.
This is a request to understand, not a s
12 matches
Mail list logo
