Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I guess headers from 'inc/ddk' would end up in 'include/ddk/ddk' in
> Wine. Not that it's a problem. However, how do we decide whether a
> header should go into Wine's 'include/ddk'? Is it based whether
> Microsoft ships it with the PSDK or the DDK?
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Actually both the latest PSDK and the DDK put ntddcdrm.h, ntddscsi.h
and ntddstor.h straight in 'include' and not in 'include/ddk'. So this
patch is probably correct.
There's no include/ddk on Windows,
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually both the latest PSDK and the DDK put ntddcdrm.h, ntddscsi.h
> and ntddstor.h straight in 'include' and not in 'include/ddk'. So this
> patch is probably correct.
There's no include/ddk on Windows, that's a Wine (and win32api)
convention to se
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.02.2006, 22:01 +1100 schrieb Troy Rollo:
ChangeLog:
Implement DVD_ReadStructure
--- /dev/null 2006-02-03 18:20:42.451563144 +1100
+++ wine-git/include/ntddcdvd.h 2006-02-05 21:50:39.0 +1100
Please use
Troy Rollo wrote:
Regardless, I'm not revisiting patches anymore. If they get in, fine, but if
not I'll just keep them on my branch - I work on more than one OSS project
and I'm not sacrificing time on others to jump through hoops for Wine.
It will probably save you time in the long run to k
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 08:48 +1100, Troy Rollo wrote:
> > Why to bother sending patches at all then if you are not planning
> > to improve them into an acceptable state?
>
> You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I place even the slightest
> value on what you, Dmitry, consider to be an
On Thursday 09 February 2006 08:38, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Why to bother sending patches at all then if you are not planning
> to improve them into an acceptable state?
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I place even the slightest
value on what you, Dmitry, consider to be an ac
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 08:23 +1100, Troy Rollo wrote:
> Regardless, I'm not revisiting patches anymore. If they get in, fine, but if
> not I'll just keep them on my branch - I work on more than one OSS project
> and I'm not sacrificing time on others to jump through hoops for Wine.
Why to bothe
On Thursday 09 February 2006 00:28, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 05.02.2006, 22:01 +1100 schrieb Troy Rollo:
> > ChangeLog:
> > Implement DVD_ReadStructure
> >
> > --- /dev/null 2006-02-03 18:20:42.451563144 +1100
> > +++ wine-git/in
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.02.2006, 22:01 +1100 schrieb Troy Rollo:
ChangeLog:
Implement DVD_ReadStructure
--- /dev/null 2006-02-03 18:20:42.451563144 +1100
+++ wine-git/include/ntddcdvd.h 2006-02-05 21:50:39.0 +1100
Please use "in
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.02.2006, 22:01 +1100 schrieb Troy Rollo:
ChangeLog:
Implement DVD_ReadStructure
--- /dev/null 2006-02-03 18:20:42.451563144 +1100
+++ wine-git/include/ntddcdvd.h 2006-02-05 21:50:39.0 +1100
Please use "in
Am Sonntag, den 05.02.2006, 22:01 +1100 schrieb Troy Rollo:
> ChangeLog:
> Implement DVD_ReadStructure
> --- /dev/null 2006-02-03 18:20:42.451563144 +1100
> +++ wine-git/include/ntddcdvd.h 2006-02-05 21:50:39.0 +1100
Please use "include/ddk/"
--
By By ...
... Detlef
12 matches
Mail list logo
