Louis wrote:
> I think it's important to add a note for the user that wine needs a bunch of
> tweaking.
It shouldn't need any tweaking at all for platinum apps.
Any apps rated platinum that need tweaking are misrated,
and we should bop them down to gold.
- Dan
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes:
>
> When making announcements about Wine 1.0, it's useful
> to include an objective measure of how well it works for
> the average app, one that correctly conveys both
> Wine's promise and its limitations.
>
> Our current appdb stats are:
>
> Platinum 1500
> G
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>> "Of the apps we have tested with Wine, about 20% work well,
>> and about another 20% work but have some glitches."
>>
>>
> Just my opinion, but that's a terrible idea to put in the 1.0
> announcement. The impression I get after reading this is (1) wine is
> full of glit
On Sunday 25 May 2008 20:41:51 Dan Kegel wrote:
> One more try:
> "Wine 1.0 runs apps like Photoshop CS2, World of Warcraft, Firefox 2,
> and a thousand other apps (see http://appdb.winehq.org) well.
> Try it on your favorite app and see if it works for you; the smaller
> the app, the more likely i
While I'd like to stay positive, this report assumes that all users who
have an application that doesn't work immediately run out and report it
to the AppDB as garbage (and while I know the same is true for apps that
do work, I'd assume its a much higher proportion of the the former).
On Sun, 2008
On 5/25/08, Ivan Gyurdiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about this for more positive yet realistic phrasing:
> > "Of the apps we have tested with Wine, about half work well
> > enough to try, and of those, half work well enough to use routinely.
> > In particular, Photoshop CS2, World of Warcr
> How about this for more positive yet realistic phrasing:
> "Of the apps we have tested with Wine, about half work well
> enough to try, and of those, half work well enough to use routinely.
> In particular, Photoshop CS2, World of Warcraft, Firefox 2, and many
> small apps run very well. .NET b
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ivan Gyurdiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Of the apps we have tested with Wine, about 20% work well,
>> and about another 20% work but have some glitches."
>
> Just my opinion, but that's a terrible idea to put in the 1.0 announcement.
> The impression I get afte
Is there somewhere a graph showing the evolution of the appdb stats over
time ?
-Leszek
Le dimanche 25 mai 2008 à 03:28 -0700, Dan Kegel a écrit :
> When making announcements about Wine 1.0, it's useful
> to include an objective measure of how well it works for
> the average app, one that correct
> "Of the apps we have tested with Wine, about 20% work well,
> and about another 20% work but have some glitches."
>
>
Just my opinion, but that's a terrible idea to put in the 1.0
announcement. The impression I get after reading this is (1) wine is
full of glitches, and (2) it's being rele
> When making announcements about Wine 1.0, it's useful
> to include an objective measure of how well it works for
> the average app, one that correctly conveys both
> Wine's promise and its limitations.
>
> Our current appdb stats are:
>
> Platinum1500
> Gold1763
> Silver
When making announcements about Wine 1.0, it's useful
to include an objective measure of how well it works for
the average app, one that correctly conveys both
Wine's promise and its limitations.
Our current appdb stats are:
Platinum1500
Gold1763
Silver 1194
Bronze
12 matches
Mail list logo
