On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just found the fix for the oledb32:convert tests on 64bit. We need to adjust
> our oledb.idl (see patch attached).
>
> How should I deal with the ok() messages where we currently specify the
> 32bit variant? I mean this will of course i
On 5 December 2010 20:05, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just found the fix for the oledb32:convert tests on 64bit. We need to adjust
> our oledb.idl (see patch attached).
Nice find.
Shouldn't these be using the _PTR types instead (ULONG_PTR, LONG_PTR
and friends?) -- then you don't need the 32/64
Am 05.12.2010 21:05, schrieb Paul Vriens:
> Hi,
>
> Just found the fix for the oledb32:convert tests on 64bit. We need to
> adjust our oledb.idl (see patch attached).
wow, good job!!!
> How should I deal with the ok() messages where we currently specify the
> 32bit variant? I mean this will of c
Hi,
Just found the fix for the oledb32:convert tests on 64bit. We need to
adjust our oledb.idl (see patch attached).
How should I deal with the ok() messages where we currently specify the
32bit variant? I mean this will of course introduce warnings on the
64bit side.
Do I need to create a
