On 2/8/2010 16:38, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 2/8/10 1:19 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture.
Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides
On 2/8/10 1:19 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture.
Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides
similar interface as IXMLHTTP.
Why shou
On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture.
Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides
similar interface as IXMLHTTP.
Why should I use urlmon for that? WinHttpRequest
On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture.
Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides
similar interface as IXMLHTTP.
Why should I use urlmon for that? WinHttpRequest should stay in
winhttp, and won't use
On 2/8/2010 05:24, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 2/7/10 3:08 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough
but since it's first time i'm using winhttp,
t
On 2/7/10 3:08 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough
but since it's first time i'm using winhttp,
there could be some problems, especially
On Sunday 07 February 2010 15:08:33 Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Such things:
> ---
> static HRESULT WINAPI HttpProtocol_Abort(IInternetProtocol *iface,
> HRESULT hrReason,
> DWORD dwOptions)
> {
> HttpProtocol *This = PROTOCOL_THIS(iface);
> FIXME("(%p)->(%08x %08x)\n", This, hrReas
On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough
but since it's first time i'm using winhttp,
there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports
async
On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough
> but since it's first time i'm using winhttp,
> there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports
> asynchronous requests.
>
> Could someone w
Hi.
Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough
but since it's first time i'm using winhttp,
there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports
asynchronous requests.
Could someone with winhttp knowledge review this patch before it goes to
far
10 matches
Mail list logo