Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-08 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/8/2010 16:38, Jacek Caban wrote: On 2/8/10 1:19 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote: On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture. Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-08 Thread Jacek Caban
On 2/8/10 1:19 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote: On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture. Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides similar interface as IXMLHTTP. Why shou

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-08 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/8/2010 05:55, Jacek Caban wrote: On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture. Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides similar interface as IXMLHTTP. Why should I use urlmon for that? WinHttpRequest

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Jacek Caban
On 2/8/10 3:36 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Even if that's true, it's not a reason to choose wrong architecture. Let's say we have a WinHttpRequest object that works, it provides similar interface as IXMLHTTP. Why should I use urlmon for that? WinHttpRequest should stay in winhttp, and won't use

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/8/2010 05:24, Jacek Caban wrote: On 2/7/10 3:08 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote: On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote: Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough but since it's first time i'm using winhttp, t

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Jacek Caban
On 2/7/10 3:08 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote: On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote: Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough but since it's first time i'm using winhttp, there could be some problems, especially

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Sunday 07 February 2010 15:08:33 Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Such things: > --- > static HRESULT WINAPI HttpProtocol_Abort(IInternetProtocol *iface, > HRESULT hrReason, > DWORD dwOptions) > { > HttpProtocol *This = PROTOCOL_THIS(iface); > FIXME("(%p)->(%08x %08x)\n", This, hrReas

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/7/2010 16:45, Hans Leidekker wrote: On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote: Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough but since it's first time i'm using winhttp, there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports async

Re: Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Sunday 07 February 2010 14:28:37 Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough > but since it's first time i'm using winhttp, > there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports > asynchronous requests. > > Could someone w

Getting start with IXMLHTTPRequest

2010-02-07 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Hi. Recently I tried to start with this interface. It looks trivial enough but since it's first time i'm using winhttp, there could be some problems, especially cause IXMLHTTPRequest supports asynchronous requests. Could someone with winhttp knowledge review this patch before it goes to far