FYI: Patch sent to wine-patches list. (NT) (WAS: Re: GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper)

2004-01-22 Thread Frank Schruefer

Re: GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper

2004-01-20 Thread Duane Clark
Frank Schruefer wrote: ( REPOST, again: I was told that my massages need long time to appear because I'm not subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], ok, but my postings as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which I'm subscribed as) never come through. Maybe that is because mozilla only allows configuration for one outgoi

Re: GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper

2004-01-20 Thread Duane Clark
Frank Schruefer wrote: ( REPOST, again: I was told that my massages need long time to appear because I'm not subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], ok, but my postings as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which I'm subscribed as) never come through. Maybe that is because mozilla only allows configuration for one outgoi

Re: GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper

2004-01-20 Thread Frank Schruefer
( REPOST, again: I was told that my massages need long time to appear because I'm not subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], ok, but my postings as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which I'm subscribed as) never come through. Maybe that is because mozilla only allows configuration for one outgoing mailserver which is

Re: GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Hearn
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:34:54 +0100, Andreas Rosenberg wrote: > Here is the output of IDA pro after detecting the compiler (Visual C familiy). > So it could detect the C lib functions. Now it is nearly obvious how the bug > happens: So why does GetCommandLineA not show up in relay or snoop traces?

GetCommandLine issue with Dungeon Keeper

2004-01-19 Thread Andreas Rosenberg
> From my notes (I dont have Linux to hand just now): > Trap occurs ar 0x43d4e2 > At this point in time the path/exe is in 0x552150 On windows: > This was copied from 0x12fe20 (Was already filled in at a breakpoint at > 0x43d4ba) > which in turn came from 0x141ee0 when the pgm is very first loaded