Re: GSoC: reg.exe

2008-03-21 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > [Somebody is already working on reg.exe.] > > Does that mean the project is no longer free for grabs? > It depends. The SoC staff frown on joint projects, but > it's possible. It seem that Andrew Riedi, the author of the reg.exe stub

Re: re: GSoC: reg.exe

2008-03-21 Thread Max99x
> [Look at other command line utilities] Thanks for the advice. So far it seems the stuff on the ConsoleConfiguration wiki page is the only requested config-related console programs. I'd be interested in implementing ftype.exe and assoc.exe from the list you linked to, but when reg.exe is complet

re: GSoC: reg.exe

2008-03-20 Thread Dan Kegel
> [Somebody is already working on reg.exe.] > Does that mean the project is no longer free for grabs? It depends. The SoC staff frown on joint projects, but it's possible. I would suggest looking at other useful commandline utilities (see e.g. the list at http://commandwindows.com ) and check wi

GSoC: reg.exe

2008-03-20 Thread Max99x
Greetings, I've noticed Wine is participating in GSoC and one of the ideas is an OSS implementation of reg.exe. I'm very interested in working on this project, but looking around the list it seems the stub was posted only a few days ago, and the author is willing to work on it in the future (I be