On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:58:42 -0800, you wrote:
> I guess we'll need to remove that
> optimization then, unless we can convince the Agent folks to fix the
> bug.
No problem, they are very convinced. It is fixed in the latest beta.
Rein.
--
Rein Klazes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The maker seem to think that the handle must be closed both by
> sub-thread and main thread before it is removed. That is how I read the
> traces as well. So that is not true?
No, handles are process wide, so closing a handle once closes it for
the whole
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:41:44 -0800, you wrote:
> Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I looked at many of these sequences. In all of them the subthread
> > finished well before the main thread executed its Wait. I was looking
> > for timing differences between the processing of the two t
Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I looked at many of these sequences. In all of them the subthread
> finished well before the main thread executed its Wait. I was looking
> for timing differences between the processing of the two threads,
> checking whether and when the WM_NULL message ge
Hi,
When downloading headers form multiple groups Agent often locks up.
The program does the following:
-(Main). main thread creates a sub thread:
| 0009:Call
kernel32.CreateThread(,2000,006648e0,41ac6cb0,0004,41ac6cb0)
ret=006649c9
| 0009: *fd* 23 <- 41
| 0009: new_thread( su
