"Abel Chiaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least with those fonts (since I can't test every single font out
> there), the patch fixes the issue. And it passes Dmitry's tests.
The problem is that looking at differences in the traces is not a good
test, since it can't be automated. What is real
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So does that test behave differently for you with your patch? Does it
> show that things are fixed? Which font are you testing with?
The patch adds a missing else to the codepage tests in
WineEngEnumFonts(), making it handle DEFAULT_CHARSET rather
"Abel Chiaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> You should provide test cases that show that your patch is correct.
>
> I used Dmitry's tests [1] for this patch.
>
> [1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036706.html
>
> Shouldn't that be enough, I'll
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > There is a patch proposed at the bug #7571
> > (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7571).
> > It works very well and I did not experiment any regression. Maybe
> > it is not the ideal patch and if it is not, maybe we c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There is a patch proposed at the bug #7571
> (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7571).
> It works very well and I did not experiment any regression. Maybe
> it is not the ideal patch and if it is not, maybe we can provide a fix for
> that. Howeve
Hi all,
Since wine 0.9.31 there is a font problem (at least latin
charset).
There is a patch proposed at the bug #7571
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7571).
It works very well and I did not experiment any regression. Maybe
it is not the ideal patch and if it is