Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
metafile.c:91: Test failed: pass 0: dx[42] (1081735508) didn't match 4
make[3]: *** [metafile.ok] Error 43
Is the metafile test supposed to be broken like this under Wine?
That's because you have no truetype fonts installed. X11 fonts are
broken in that respect.
Thanks for
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I get when I run 'make test' on Wine:
[skipped]
> metafile.c:91: Test failed: pass 0: dx[42] (1081735508) didn't match 4
> make[3]: *** [metafile.ok] Error 43
>
> Is the metafile test supposed to be broken like this under Wine?
That's becaus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from when I ran winetest.exe from the desktop:
http://test.winehq.org/data/200411021000/2000/gdi32:metafile.txt :
metafile.c:126:hdcDisplay 76010815
metafile.c:154:hdcMetafile 202107C1
metafile.c:40:hdc 76010815, emr->iType 1, emr->nSize 108, param 0022FB58
met
If you run stuff from this shell, it should run without a GUI... or
something.
Could come in handy for debugging of winetest.exe
Haven't tested it yet, but have a go:
http://p-nand-q.com/download/supershell.html
Chris Morgan wrote:
I've tried enabling this option and then popping up a dialog box and no dialog was
displayed. It should be an easy change to re-enable this option. I'll try it
tonight. What should I look for to see if this metafile test runs correctly?
metafile.c:182: Test failed: EnumE
> Is that a service option or what? I don't really know
> anything about Windows services. If you can fix this issue
> in winrash please do so.
>
I've tried enabling this option and then popping up a dialog box and no dialog was
displayed. It should be an easy change to re-enable this option.
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Ferenc Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a
service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest
itself can happily run on the real
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>> "Ferenc Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a
>>> service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest
>>> itself can happily run on the real visible deskt
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Ferenc Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a
service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest
itself can happily run on the real visible desktop, it's
just people seldom run it that way (ie. directly).
"Ferenc Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a
> service process running on an invisible desktop. Winetest
> itself can happily run on the real visible desktop, it's
> just people seldom run it that way (ie. directly).
Then we need either
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is what makes the tests create invisible
> windows? Does winetest run as a service on a not visible
> desktop? Anything else?
Winrash, which invokes winetest in most of the cases, is a
service process running on an invisible desktop.
Dmitry wrote:
> The question is what makes the tests create invisible windows? Does
> winetest run as a service on a not visible desktop? Anything else?
I believe this is the reason. The shellpath tests fail on WinXP, I
believe because HKCU doesn't exist because the service doesn't interact
with
"Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems the test fails in non-interactive mode without this patch.
No, the problem seems to be related to a window's visibility. Windows
does not play EMF records if the DC was created for a not visible window.
A lot of other tests fail due to exactly
13 matches
Mail list logo
