Hello Gé.
I ran the test 30 times using the same way you did without any failure.
I used a vm with 1 CPU assigned too. Installed is a Windows XP with SP2.
If I start the test twice so that two tests are running parallel then I
get test failures too, but:
Do we really have the requirement that te
> From: Ge van Geldorp [mailto:g...@gse.nl] On Behalf Of 'Florian Köberle'
Sorry, I messed up the headers. The previous message containing:
> BTW, this causes failures also with my own fix applied (althoug only a
> single failure instead of a bunch), so my own fix wasn't correct either.
was sent
> From: Ge van Geldorp [mailto:g...@gse.nl]
> I've done some more experimenting and can get the problem to
> reproduce more consistently (like 95% of the time instead of
> 25%) by launching my shortcut twice (so I have two test runs
> going at the same time). Then both of the runs will usually
Florian,
> From: Florian Köberle [mailto:flor...@fkoeberle.de]
> How many cores do your processor have?
> I have a dual core which might make the difference.
I ran inside a VM that had 1 CPU assigned, so single core.
> How exactly do you execute the tests?
> I executed "../../../tools/runtest -
Hello Gé.
>> I think the main problem is that the thread might run
>> parallel with some other test code.
>>
>> That is why I would suggest to wait for the thread to finish
>> at the end of the test.
>>
>> I made a patch and attached it to this email. I can't
>> reproduce the failure on my syste
Hi Florian,
> From: Florian Köberle [mailto:flor...@fkoeberle.de]
> I think the main problem is that the thread might run
> parallel with some other test code.
>
> That is why I would suggest to wait for the thread to finish
> at the end of the test.
>
> I made a patch and attached it to this
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
>> From: Reece Dunn [mailto:mscl...@googlemail.com]
>>
>> Do you know why you need to do a SetForegroundWindow there to
>> make the tests succeed?
>> Why is the input being sent to a different window?
>> Why does it vary from platform-to-platform and machine-to-machine?
>>
Reece Dunn wrote:
2009/1/30 Ge van Geldorp :
From: Reece Dunn
The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
(http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group
_XP).
Actually, that was not the first time. On 20 Jan an XP machine passed:
http://test.winehq.o
> From: Reece Dunn [mailto:mscl...@googlemail.com]
>
> Do you know why you need to do a SetForegroundWindow there to
> make the tests succeed?
> Why is the input being sent to a different window?
> Why does it vary from platform-to-platform and machine-to-machine?
It's a timing issue. It doesn't
2009/1/30 Ge van Geldorp :
>> From: Reece Dunn
>>
>> The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
>>
> (http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group
> _XP).
>
> Actually, that was not the first time. On 20 Jan an XP machine passed:
> http://test.winehq.org/
> From: Reece Dunn
>
> The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
>
(http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group
_XP).
Actually, that was not the first time. On 20 Jan an XP machine passed:
http://test.winehq.org/data/e9d8c9f572998054b1f9c386ea81a3570
Reece Dunn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
> (http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group_XP).
> Two of the other four only have 2 or 3 failures.
>
> The 2003 group has 3 machines with 1 failure each (urlmon:protocol on
> one
2009/1/29 Dan Kegel :
> Wow, that's awesome! A day seven years in the making...
> 2009: the test suite passes for somebody besides Alexandre on Wine:
> http://www.winehq.org/wwn/355#Test%20Suite%20Passes!
We'll have a new link to WWN 356 for Test Suite Passes v2 : Windows Style :)
Congrats to t
Wow, that's awesome! A day seven years in the making...
2002: the C test suite is started:
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=caa03388b64f444f9b4ef664ec5039d5bf72
2003: winetest committed:
http://www.winehq.org/wwn/199#Winetest%20Integrated%20&%20Future%20Steps
2004: server
Hi,
The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
(http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group_XP).
Two of the other four only have 2 or 3 failures.
The 2003 group has 3 machines with 1 failure each (urlmon:protocol on
one, user32:menu on the others).
Con
15 matches
Mail list logo
