Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:51:02PM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also, why did it take so long to tackle that?
> > (I had this error several weeks ago already)
> > There have been multiple reports by different people that 2.6.x is broken,
>
Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, why did it take so long to tackle that?
> (I had this error several weeks ago already)
> There have been multiple reports by different people that 2.6.x is broken,
> yet not too much of a reaction.
> Oh, and to top it: it's still broken ;-)
You are
gt; size 6a4000 flags 6020
> > 0009:err:module:map_image Could not map section .text, file probably
> > truncated
>
> This is fixed in current CVS.
No it's not :-\
I still get this error with current CVS (fetched from rhlx01, rhlx01
IS in sync) on starting a setup on
Thomas Brix Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0009:trace:module:map_image mapped PE file at 0x40-0xf89000
> 0009:trace:module:map_image mapping section .text at 0x401000 off 1000
> size 6a4000 flags 6020
> 0009:err:module:map_image Could not map section .text, file pr
> 0009:trace:module:map_image mapping section .text at 0x401000
Thomas> off 1000 size 6a4000 flags 6020 0009:err:module:map_image
Thomas> Could not map section .text, file probably truncated
Thomas> Why?
Maybe the file is really truncated or prpbably it has a Virus...
file probably
truncated
Why?
Anybody please?
--
Thomas Brix Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
