On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:23:24PM -0800, Duane Clark wrote:
> No, that is the named pipe problem. I retain a private patch in my tree,
> which reverts the named pipe patch that causes the crawl.
Just a thought: This is not the only time, where a hack is used to fix a
specific problem/application
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
"Duane" == Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Duane> Hans Leidekker wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:01, Duane Clark wrote:
>>
>>> For some reason, a comment end is missing there. But otherwise, it
>>> seems to work fine with the one important a
> "Duane" == Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Duane> Hans Leidekker wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:01, Duane Clark wrote:
>>
>>> For some reason, a comment end is missing there. But otherwise, it
>>> seems to work fine with the one important app I use file
Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:01, Duane Clark wrote:
For some reason, a comment end is missing there. But otherwise, it seems
to work fine with the one important app I use file notification on.
Which app is that?
Xilinx ISE, a program for use when designing with Xilinx ch
On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:01, Duane Clark wrote:
> > +/* TODO: - security attribute changes
> > + * - compound filter and multiple notifications
> > + * - subtree notifications
> > + * - non-documented flags FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_LAST_ACCESS and
> > + * FILE_NOTIFY_CHAN
Hans Leidekker wrote:
+
+/* TODO: - security attribute changes
+ * - compound filter and multiple notifications
+ * - subtree notifications
+ * - non-documented flags FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_LAST_ACCESS and
+ * FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_CREATION
+
For some reason, a comment end is mis
