It would be gr8 if you could check with MIDL and WIDL the output of msxml.idl
On 8/29/06, Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the
> expansion of interfaces def
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the
> expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in
> foobar.idl
> eg: foobar.idl
> #include "foo.idl"
>
> For further reference see the msxml.id
But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the
expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in
foobar.idl
eg: foobar.idl
#include "foo.idl"
For further reference see the msxml.idl in the PSDK headers.
it includes xmldom.idl and xmldso.idl, but in the msxml.h
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files.
> It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible.
> msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include "xmldso.idl")
> where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defin
Hi,
I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files.
It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible.
msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include "xmldso.idl")
where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defined by
xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl.
This is done so that we there would b
