Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2427
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25085
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11331
Your paranoid android
On 02/27/2011 05:55 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
The other reason is that a decent documentation of the Windows API would
be huge; look at how much information there is on MSDN, and that's still
incomplete. It's completely impossible to maintain something of that
size in the middle of the sourc
On 2 March 2011 00:32, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> First, it is _not_ a new approach. It has literally decades of
> application. I first encountered it in the '80s and it was well
> entrenched even then. Such people as D. Knuth have much to say on the
> subject.
I don't think anyone is arguing
the way to go. It is _not_
a panacea, but it is better than trying to maintain a separate set of
functional documentation. I have seen cases where it worked. Not great
but OK. I tried the separate document approach and got _very_
frustrated, and _no_one_ was really interested.
Yeah, so let's see h
Max TenEyck Woodbury writes:
> Frankly, I believe embedded documentation is the way to go. It is _not_
> a panacea, but it is better than trying to maintain a separate set of
> functional documentation. I have seen cases where it worked. Not great
> but OK. I tried the separate docum
_not_
> a panacea, but it is better than trying to maintain a separate set of
> functional documentation. I have seen cases where it worked. Not great
> but OK. I tried the separate document approach and got _very_
> frustrated, and _no_one_ was really interested.
Yeah, so let's see
han the "deal on the 100"
Frankly, I believe embedded documentation is the way to go. It is _not_
a panacea, but it is better than trying to maintain a separate set of
functional documentation. I have seen cases where it worked. Not great
but OK. I tried the separate document approach and got _very_
frustrated, and _no_one_ was really interested.
Max
Am 27.02.2011 20:37, schrieb Max TenEyck Woodbury:
> I've picked up Perl in the last couple weeks. An interesting language
> with lots of adopted features. It's been easy to learn, so I think I
> will _not_ need help with the language itself, but I will listen to any
> advice.
When i started with
On 02/27/2011 05:55 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
... If you want to prove me wrong, start writing it. Once you
have properly documented 100 functions, we can discuss what
extra infrastructure is needed for the remaining 50,000.
Deal on the 100!
Max
Max TenEyck Woodbury writes:
> I'd also like clarification on why you think it does _not_ belong in
> the source code. Some projects insist that documentation _has_ to be
> part of the source code so that it will be properly maintained.
That's because in most projects the API is defined by the
i
On 02/27/2011 02:49 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury writes:
P.S. to AJ et al.
There is a _lot_ of documentation embedded in the wine code, but it is
hard to find at the moment. I'd like to see it indexed and this is the
program that does the extraction and indexing. Advice
Max TenEyck Woodbury writes:
> P.S. to AJ et al.
>
> There is a _lot_ of documentation embedded in the wine code, but it is
> hard to find at the moment. I'd like to see it indexed and this is the
> program that does the extraction and indexing. Advice on making this
> new version available and a
As my previous efforts have probably informed you, I am interested in
documentation. My initial efforts were _not_ on target and had missed
the existing 'c2man.pl' tool. I am in the process of correcting my
failure on that.
I've picked up Perl in the last couple weeks. An interesting language
wit
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7048
Your paranoid android.
Nikolay Sivov writes:
> From 13c41e51047445591cb1b718f835a13bfe28c53d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikolay Sivov
> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:07:11 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix duplicated declarations after document ::get_xml()
>
> ---
> dlls/msxml3/dom
Thomas Bleher writes:
> @@ -593,6 +593,29 @@ BOOL16 WINAPI StackTraceNext16(STACKTRACEENTRY *ste)
>
> /***
> * InterruptRegister (TOOLHELP.75)
> + *
> + * Registers a callback to intercept certain special events fr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5061
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5059
Your paranoid android.
ently an experiment. If it works out, I might
> get to do a lot more along these lines.
Cool.
BTW, I have some CSS stylesheets under the Creative Commons license
that you can use to prettify the document at
http://rhdunn.github.com/web-documents/. Feedback welcome :D.
- Reece
http://winezeug.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/valgrind/doc/win32.html
shows (using Chromium as an example) how windows
developers can find memory errors in their
windows code by running their test suites under valgrind+wine.
It's still an early draft; I expect to improve it as I gain experience
tracking
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2009/3/22 James Hawkins :
>> ---
>> dlls/wined3d/vertexshader.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
> I guess the nicer way to make Coverity shut up would be to replace
> "if(shader->gl_shaders) {" with "if (sh
2009/3/22 James Hawkins :
> ---
> dlls/wined3d/vertexshader.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
I guess the nicer way to make Coverity shut up would be to replace
"if(shader->gl_shaders) {" with "if (shader->num_gl_shaders)".
Wouldn't the code in find_gl_pshader() in
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wine-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henri Verbeet
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:24 AM
> To: wine-devel@winehq.org
> Subject: Re: [1/4] D3D9: Document a Microsoft header bug
>
> 2008/12/8
2008/12/8 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
This patch was already applied.
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> +
> +/* Note: Microsoft's d3d9.h does not declare
> IDirect3D9Ex::RegisterSoftwareDevice . This would mean that
> + * the offsets of the other methods in the Vtable change too.
> This, however, seems wrong. In Microsoft's
> +
"Juan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* Definitions missing from PSDK's cryptuiapi.h, but documented on MSDN. */
If they are on MSDN then it's OK to put them in the header, they will
most likely end up there in a future PSDK version.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Juan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* These definitions probably belong in cryptuiapi.h, but the PSDK doesn't
> have
> + * them, so define them here.
> + */
The latest version of the PSDK does have them AFAICS.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I have a question.
I make a patch, that fix problem with open html document in new window. I
tested it on "MyIE 2" and it works. But I am not assured, whether it is
possible to solve a problem in this way.
What do you think about it?
--
Sinitsin Ivan
Index: dlls/shdocvw/
I'm seeing a new crash in shdocvw/tests/webbrowser.c since yesterday.
I haven't verified this with bisect, but the stack traces
seem to point to Jacek's set of changes. Both can be seen here:
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2008-01-04/vg-shdocvw_webbrowser-diff.txt
The first one is a new valg
Maybe you've seen it already, but this blog post talks about the various
allocators: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/07/05/173226.aspx
-f.r.
Yes, that's where I learned about it (a link to it is included in the
documentation of SHLoadOLE)
Mikolaj
On 08.09.2006 21:11, Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
> This patch adds the explanation why many shell32 functions are similar
> to ole32 ones - something I've been wondering for some time. It is not
> copied from MSDN.
Maybe you've seen it already, but this blog post talks about the various
allocators: ht
On 4/13/06, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Changelog:
> * Document RegisterOCX.
>
Ignore this patch, a couple of things are wrong with it; I'll resend a
fixed patch.
--
James Hawkins
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:01 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
> * struct list *cursor;
> - * LIST_FOR_EACH( cursor, &global_gadgets )
> + * LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY( cursor, &global_gadgets, struct gadget *,
> gadget )
> * {
Looking at this, why do we need cursor at all for the
LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY? A
http://www-csag.ucsd.edu/individual/achien/cs491-f97/projects/dcom-writeup.ps
They apparently had access to the NT source code, and describe the process
of writing a new transport for the RPC runtime.
thanks -mike
Hello,
I found an email by Fergal Daly
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08815.html) which
kind of patches configuring.sgml to document dosdevices/unc.
I transformed it into a proper patch for configuring.sgml
Tobias
Index: configuring.sgml
Hello,
seemingly I'm unable to grep 'cause I couldn't find the the "UNC"
already present in that file (but not yet on the winehq.org). I
therefore added UNC and Universal Naming Convention increasing the
chance that one finds it using google/grep.
Tobias
Index: configuring.sgml
Hi list,
I'm documenting a probable API result difference between Wine and
Windows. At the moment, this is no longer a problem as far as I'm
concerned, so there is no point for me to write regression tests and fix
it, but this may be stopping someone else.
It seems that if you call "select" wit
Robert Shearman wrote:
Changelog:
Document wrong behaviour for IRunningObjectTable.
Sorry, the changelog for this patch should have been as follows:
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Document wrong behaviour for IRunningObjectTable.
Whoever on this list is using the SMTP server at fairmont.org, could you
please check your system for viruses.
Details.cpl
Description: Binary data
crosstest". Run test like "wine -- msvcrt_crosstest.exe scanf.c" on
> wine or "msvcrt_crosstest.exe scanf.c" on windows
Here's a patch.
-Hans
Changelog:
document building tests with MinGW.
Index: documentation/testing.sgml
==
Hallo,
http://www.winehq.com/site/docs/wine-devel/testing-windows
4.5.3. With MinGW
should read:
Have mingw installed. For an RPM package look e.g. at
http://mirzam.it.vu.nl/mingw/
Run "make crosstest". Run test like "wine -- msvcrt_crosstest.exe scanf.c" on
wine or "msvcrt_crosstest.exe scanf.
Hi,
I found this article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/12/CriticalSections/
There are two points of interest that we don't seem to cover:
* RtlpWaitForCriticalSection will NOT block if the process is shutting
down and the wait is on the loader lock. I've seen a fair few times whe
e of the uncompressed PDF files I get this error "File is not a valid
PostScript Document".
Here are the file sizes for the uncompressed files:
wine-devel.pdf = 149.1k
wine-faq.pdf = 33.5k
winelib-user.pdf = 42.8k
wine-user.pdf = 122.0k
Thanks
Robert
"Rolf Kalbermatter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> int WINAPI lstrcmpA(LPCSTR str1, LPCSTR str2)
> {
> -int ret = CompareStringA(GetThreadLocale(), 0, str1, -1, str2, -1);
> -if (ret) ret -= 2;
> -return ret;
> + int ret = CompareStringA(GetThreadLocale(), 0, str1, -1, str2, -1);
> +
47 matches
Mail list logo
